Support |
> Actually a lot of that show was using Replace in an UNquantized manner, > but executing it rhythmically - "riding bareback," so to speak. Yes, it's actually easier unquantised. I was just guessing at what you might be doing. > But > there was certainly some 8th-quantization towards the end of the set. ;-) > > > That's a new thing in Loop4, intended to allow a connection > > between the far out glitchy stuff and the more straightforward type > > of looping. > > Just out of curiosity, here: am I to understand from your comment that > one of the specific ideas behind 8th-quantization was to harness the > glitch stuff into a more overly rhythmic fashion? And am I correct in > assuming that you were the main guy who brought 8th-quant to the table? Well one chain of events is that I suggested 8th Quantise to Matthias and he programmed it in a couple of hours. (then came the debugging) ...but I don't know if the idea had been brought up before. The main reason for 8th Quant was to allow a way to divide the loop time accuratly. Something that David Torn had long been asking for. I also thought about how 8th Quant could be used with Replace(+Substitute) to produce glitchy stuff within a rhythmic framework. A bit like using v.small loops with Quant=CYC and then using Insert, but allows you to keep the same time sig as defined by 8th/cycle. The way that a short press of Replace (and some other SUS functions) works with Quantise was specifically aimed at making it very easy to replace a single beat. (just one tap, then EDP waits for the quant point, and just does one 8th/cycle, (or Cycle, or Loop depending on Quant). ..and as that idea fixed a bug , Matthias made it happen. So 8th Quant gives you rhythmic glitchy. Also 8th Quant makes it easier to set up a polyrhythmic relationship to an incoming MIDI clock or brothersync. I was particularly pleased to make a loop a fifth of the length of the beat I had going on the other plex. andy butler