Support |
> You miss the point. The Repeater infringed the *patent*, not the > product! I suppose I am looking at all of this from a selfish standpoint - that being that I had to go through a load of hell to actually obtain a repeater. Deep down, I am very much anti-patents. To me, they stifle innovation and progress.... ....but I stand corrected with regards to the Repeater/DJRND. Thanks Kim & appologies all around. -- Stuart Wyatt (Solo String Project) - http://SoloString.com