Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I KNEW I shouldn't have said that I was classically-trained! That puts everybody on the defensive. My preferences are very wide, from the most conservative of conservatives, to somewhere short of metal and punk. Thinking globally here, music is an outgrowth of one's culture, so I believe there is no bad style of music insofar as there is no bad culture. But, in the words of Duke Ellington, "If it sounds good, it is good." The technology should not take away from music, but add to it. If you get the two reversed, it doesn't sound good. Yes, it's an endless philosophical discussion. -----Original Message----- From: S.P. Goodman [mailto:spgoodman@earthlight.net] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:17 AM To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: Or, the occasionally opaque veil of opinion ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Bolan" <pbolan@csiconstruction.com> To: <> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 16:37:PM Subject: Loopfest - the opaque veil of technology > As a classically-trained musician, I'd like to say a few words in the > name of music. > > Many of the acts at the Portland Loopfest were more "performance art". > Hearing wave upon wave of amorphous withering masses of sound, including > unintentional (?) feedback, screaming, and cursing, was overpowering. > > Call me a purist, but the technology should be used to augment a > performer's skill in their instrument of choice. Okay, you're a purist. :) > Most of the time, what > I heard was "look-what-I-can-do-with-this-cool-piece-of-gear". They > probably had chops, but the opaque veil of technology had descended on > their performances, covering up their true musical talents. In what respect? Obviously the musicians you refer to didn't say that, but how did this translate out to such a statement? > (To be fair, I did not hear Admiral Twinkle Devil.) > > Let's use this amazing technology to create things that are articulate > and wonderful. Ah, yes, but the question then would be whose version of "articulate and wonderful" you're talking about. Then again I tend to prefer "thought-provoking and non-conformist". I hated the hell out of a DNA performance, and said so here last year -- but the first thing I wanted to do when I got home from the show was play guitar. In terms of ones' expectations of music in this regard, I've found that more often than not that preconceived notions can be far more opaque than hardware, and far more limiting content-wise. If the question then is "Captain Beefheart or Bach?", I'd tend to say that such is not a question at all, but a statement of personal taste -- that is, when one reveals what one DOES like. So, what do YOU like? S.P. Goodman EarthLight Productions * http://www.earthlight.net/Gallery - Cartoons and Illustrations! http://www.earthlight.net/HiddenTrack - Cartoons via Medialine!