Support |
>I think that is the point of the PolyOctave, but I could be wrong. >Speaking of >Hexfuzz, some of the most beautiful fuzzy tone comes from Matthais' >little self >made box. I don't know much about it, but the tone he gets is pretty >amazing. >I wonder why he hasn't tried to commercially produce it. I did, 1984 in Frankfurt. And I really tried hard to explain that it can be used to play chords, but still, the ones that would be able to play polyphonically said: "I will never try any distortion" and the ones interested in distortion did some quick solo line and were disapointed that it did not sound as dirty as the Marshall. I did not just build 6 filters and 6 distortiors, but the clipping is dynamic, so strings with different volumes will still have thoses different volumes after distortion, so you can make a melody stand out of a chord. And you all heard it at Loopstock :-) And its on my site, you can build one. > >Mark Sottilaro > >Mark Hamburg wrote: > >> on 1/2/03 10:46 AM, Richard Zvonar at zvonar@zvonar.com wrote: >> >> > RMC also makes the Freakout Box, which provides individual audio >> > outputs per string. This presents interesting possibilities for >> > surround sound and for string-specific effects processing. >> >> I don't want most of the modeling on the VG-8/88 so I haven't been >able to >> justify getting a hex pickup and getting a VG-88, but I really could >be more >> tempted by a hex pickup if I could just get a good hex fuzz for it. >The RMC >> breakout box plus six fuzz pedals, however, does not seem cost >effective. >> Maybe the Boss PolyOctave does that but it certainly isn't clear from >the >> online information as to whether the distortion is per string or not. >> >> Mark >> >> P.S. As a poor man's hex-a-fuzz substitute, has anyone tried the PAiA >> Quadrafuzz? -- ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org