Support |
At 21:32 04/02/03 , you wrote: > >>> ...a good MIDI foot controller with just one row > >I would consider using the FCB1010 anyway, and just forget about the >upper/rear row of foot switches. Put some kind of barrier over them to >prevent tactile confusion with the lower/front row. The unit is well >built, >very inexpensive (and even cheaper on Ebay), and has a very active yahoo >group with hundreds of members. That's an interesting suggestion, I guess that the Behringer FCB 1010 bottom row would be fine. What functions would I loose by only using one row? How is it configured and can the switches have programmable assignments? Ian. >Half the yahoo list chatter is about how confusing the manual is, granted >:) > >But still, it is a good unit. Behringer has updated the firmware several >times since the unit was released so that bodes well for continuing >support. > >Bob > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ian Popperwell" <popperwell@iname.com> >To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> >Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:23 PM >Subject: MIDI Foot controllers > > >> Hi, >> >> I have posted on this subject before but am still looking for what I >need >> and could do with a bit of help. >> >> I'm looking for a good MIDI foot controller with just one row of >> well-spaced foot switches - with or without a pedal. This is because I >have >> very little eye sight and can't hit the double-row controllers with any >> degree of accuracy. I posted a couple of weeks ago about the Philip Rees >> MM5 (now discontinued) but guess that nobody on the list has experience >of >> using it. I've checked out as many makes and models as I can find but >they >> all now seem to have two rows - Yamaha, Roland, Behringer, Digitech, >Zoom, >> Rocktron, Peavey(?)... >> >> I use a MIDI Wind controller with a couple of modules, a synth with >> arpegiator and fx units and am saving for an EDP (I currently use a >trusty >> DL4) -. I need/want to be able to send MIDI clock, prog changes, set up >> drones, start/stop arpegiator and transmit chord info to arpegiator, + >in >> the future control the EDP. If I can't do all these things, my access >to a >> pedalboard is more important to me than features - some of em would be >> better than none. >> >> Any advice would be very helpful. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Ian. >> >> >> >