|
What a strange subject ...
A baby is just a wise new person (more wise than everybody on this mailing
list) , and it has nothing to do with the creativity of the parents.
Where could it be linked ?
one could think the love he or she could share with a son or a daughter
could "damage" the love to music.
I can just say it doesn't. Here is what it does to have baby :
Love is only one thing , and it can't be splitted : whether it is
active in you, whether it is not.
A baby won't change this , but it will open your eyes on what you call love
or passion...
Many musician (including women) are usually afraid of changing this
pov.
It is because they know deep inside that their pov is not the best one, but
they don't want to admit it :)
I won't extend all that more longer,
have babies and stop selfish music.
Link
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 11:33
AM
Subject: Re: why loop when you can just
make babies!
mark quit being an
asshole.
thanks,
jimmy
----- Original Message -----
From:
Mark Sottilaro <sine@zerocrossing.net>
To:
<Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent:
Sunday, March 30, 2003 10:25 PM
Subject: why loop when you can just make
babies!
> On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Jimmy George
Band wrote:
>
> > mark jesse is a big guy, 6'4 and built like
a brick shit house. hes a
> > mean
> > one too if you know
what i mean.
>
> Oh, OK. I take it all back then. He
was totally right. I agree it's
> crazy for a woman to want to be
creative when she could just have a
> baby instead.
>
>
>>> On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 11:12 AM, Jesse Ray Lucas
wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Why would females bother
with these lesser arts when they come
> >>>> naturally
equipped with potential to exercise the highest form of
>
>>>> creativity?
>
> Someone like my wife, who's
never wanted children and drove me to my
> vasectomy to make sure it
didn't happen, must have been crazy to choose
> to be barren and spend
her extra leisure time doing music, graphic and
> jewelry design when
she could have had the joy of bearing and raising
> my children
instead. (who I'm sure would be sweet little angels, just
> like
I am/was) Also, I see that my reason to make music is totally
>
different now that I'm infertile.
>
> I'm sorry Jesse, you
thinking that a woman's ability to create life
> could be a substitute
for creativity was not creepy or sexist in the
> least. I stand
corrected. Please don't hit me, pull my hair or take
> my
sandwich.
>
> Mark Sottilaro
>
>
|
