Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Yes, and its so easy just tapping the record after multiply...ha,ha i love it! With the edp i have to stop thinking in terms of software:-) --- Goddess <thefates@earthlink.net> wrote: > <smile> -or, even more accurately, as Kim has > mentioned, regular > multiply ended with record as well. *laughing* > fortunately I read > further this time, before answering that next > e-mail! lol! > > Smiles, > > Cara > > At 11:50 PM 5/10/03 -0600, you wrote: > > Louie, you can eliminate a middle section from a > loop with the EDP, by > >using multiply. -or more accurately, sus unrounded > multiply. > > If your loop consisted of an A B and C section > like you mention, you can > >wait until B passes, and then engage sus unrounded > multiply as C starts, > >and then disengage it after the A section goes by. > Now, you've > >effectively eliminated the B section. Does this > make sense? > > As someone else mentioned, windowing can do this > too, but this way may be > >quicker and more precise I think. <smile> -HOpe > this helps. > > > >Smiles, > > > >Cara > > > >At 12:22 PM 5/8/03 -0700, you wrote: > >>Mark you are absolutely right man! > >>I have both the EDP and repeater and sometimes i > just > >>get too exhausted specially syncing them > together.I > >>spend too much time on the technical side of > things > >>and lately i am very unfocused on the music.I ve > been > >>thinking of taking one of them out of my rack for > a > >>couple of months just to build a better > relationship > >>with one of them.In terms of creativity they are > both > >>animals! > >>Another thing ive noticed is that i do most of my > >>looping uncounsciously within the first 10 seconds > at > >>the most.I suppose certain limitations are healthy > at > >>times as well... > >>My one wish from both loopers for example would be > >>that i could cut a middle part (from A,B,C cut B > and > >>paste A and C together) sort of like Acid.Or is > there > >>a way of accompishing this... > >>You loop gurus outhere? > >>Cheers > >>Louie > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>--- mark <sine@zerocrossing.net> wrote: > >>> I can't imagine using the word "sync" and "Line6 > >>> Echo Pro" in the same > >>> sentence... unless you're talking about it's > delays, > >>> and even then I'd > >>> say it's not really syncing. However, this can > be > >>> very cool too. A > >>> few weeks ago Will Wright and I jammed, he on > the > >>> Echo Pro and I using > >>> a Repeater and we more or less just set the Echo > >>> Pro's loop size my > >>> ear. Since what will was doing was leaning > toward > >>> the abstract it was > >>> interesting to have the sync of his loop > constantly > >>> drifting from my > >>> loops which firmly follow the drummachine. That > >>> constantly changing > >>> relationship is nice. > >>> > >>> There are days I still miss my JamMan's "simple" > >>> operation (I had an > >>> early Bob Sallon chip mod that gave me some new > >>> functions, but I don't > >>> think I got things like the panning and multiple > >>> concurrent loops) It > >>> makes me want one again! What I love best about > the > >>> JamMan that *no* > >>> other looper does? One step loop creation when > >>> synced to a MIDI clock. > >>> I choose the amount of beats it looks for and > the > >>> start point and then > >>> I can just PLAY. Yeah, I know you can do > something > >>> a little similar > >>> with the EDP, but I've tried that and it's *not* > the > >>> same. My request > >>> for Loop5 would be to have a mode where you can > set > >>> up your quantize > >>> and after hitting record automatically go into > >>> overdub after a > >>> specified number of beats. > >>> > >>> For a short time I did run an EDP and a Repeater > at > >>> the same time, and > >>> I found it to be too much. Each unit does > PLENTY in > >>> my opinion. I > >>> rarely ended up using them both together, but I > >>> would imagine like > >>> anything it would need lot's of practice. It > always > >>> felt like I was > >>> that guy who spins plates on the Ed Sullivan > show > >>> when I was using > >>> multiple loopers. Too hard to focus on the > music, > >>> especially in a live > >>> context where things are more chaotic. > >>> > >>> Mark Sottilaro > >>> > >>> On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 08:12 AM, > >>> goddard.duncan@mtvne.com wrote: > >>> > >>> > stuart's post about syncing three line6 > echopros > >>> reminded me that I > >>> > wanted to ask the list if anybody had tried > doing > >>> much the same thing > >>> > with two or more jammans. my band has two, and > two > >>> repeaters aswell. > >>> > >> > >> > >>===== > >>www.labalou.com > >> > >>__________________________________ > >>Do you Yahoo!? > >>The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > >>http://search.yahoo.com > >> > >> > > > > > >--- > > > > "The only things I really think are important, > are love, and eachother. > >-Then, anything is possible..." > > > >http://home.earthlink.net/~thefates > > > >Please visit BadFiction and The Guitar Cafe. > > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/badfiction > > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the-guitar-cafe > > > > > > > > > --- > > "The only things I really think are important, are > love, and eachother. > -Then, anything is possible..." > > http://home.earthlink.net/~thefates > > Please visit BadFiction and The Guitar Cafe. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/badfiction > === message truncated === ===== www.labalou.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com