Support |
At 10:24 AM 5/29/2003, Rick Walker/Loop.pooL wrote: >It is just the only story that I can use to combat your assertions that >we >are completely ineffective in getting the word out to the masses. I don't think I said you were ineffective, I'm saying the strategy doesn't make sense. Effectively doing something that doesn't make sense seems like a lot of energy that might be better applied in a different way. >I have a challenge for you: Instead of constantly nay-saying what we are >attempting to accomplish by producing Live Looping Festivals, that sure sounds bad. What I'm doing is challenging you to think clearly through what you are doing, so that it hopefully has a stronger foundation to grow on. >why don't you brainstorm and alternate strategy to push Live Looping to >world of non loopers. Do you mean push Looping to non-looper musicians in the hopes they might become Loopers themselves? I already did come up with a strategy for that. It's called Looper's Delight. Over 125,000 people visit it each month and learn something or another about looping. I don't really have the energy to come up with more than that. Or do you mean push Looping to non-musicians in the hopes they will come listen to it? That's exactly what I've been saying doesn't make sense if looping can be anything, so I don't quite see the point. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com