Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Suck because you're Looping ?



  Actually, the Jam Man can.  I've done it.  What it does, is to
arbitrarily start the loop from it's beginning, after it's played through,
to fill the new space when the clock is slowed, and then restart again at
the proper pulse, or do the opposite, and cut off the end of the loop and
restart to keep in sync when the clock is sped up.   So you end up with
loops of differing lengths intersperced with eachother.  It's actually very
cool.  

Smiles,

Cara

At 06:14 PM 6/27/03 -0700, you wrote:
>?!  Uh, I never said that Phil Keaggy would perfer a JamMan over an 
>echoplex.  (I don't even know him or his music) However, I can 
>speculate that he liked the very simple elegant interface the JamMan 
>uses.  The reason I liked it is because all I had to do is tap once to 
>start my loop, and then it would count a preset amount of beats 
>(clocked to MIDI) and then go out of record.  Instant loop synced to a 
>MIDI clock.  All new loops would also match up and you could toggle 
>between them like an EDP.  I know you can kind of do that using 
>quantize functions on the EDP, but I've tried it and it's not the same.
>
>However, the fidelity of the EDP is way better than the JamMan and if 
>money was no object, dual EDPs would be the way to go.
>
>I've kind of grown hooked to the way the Repeater can chase a clock 
>that changes.  The JamMan and EDP can't sync to a clock that changes 
>tempo.
>
>Mark Sottilaro
>
>On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 05:59  PM, Terry Blankenship wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Why do you think Phil Keaggy would prefer a Jam Man
>> over an echoplex? Does it do things you can't do on an
>> echoplex, or was he just morte use to the jam man?
>>
>> Terry
>>
>> --- mark <sine@zerocrossing.net> wrote:
>>> On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 10:17  AM, Clayton Gary
>>> Lehmann wrote:
>>>> Greg replied:
>>>> I've been thinking about this concept for a day or
>>> two now, the idea
>>>> that we would use loopers to cover up the fact
>>> that we are poor
>>>> instrumentalists.
>>>
>>> If anything it's the exact opposite.  Unless you're
>>> equipped with a
>>> looper with an "undo" function, you're sure to hear
>>> that mistake over
>>> and over, where as in a live performance it usually
>>> looms bigger in
>>> your mind than your audience, as it's totally
>>> transient.  I cut my
>>> looping teeth on a JamMan which had no undo, and now
>>> that I've gone
>>> Repeater, I must admit I don't use it too much.  I'm
>>> not perfect, I
>>> just forget I have it.
>>>
>>> Mark Sottilaro
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>>
>
>


---

  "The only things I really think are important, are love, and eachother.
-Then, anything is possible..."  

http://home.earthlink.net/~thefates

Please visit BadFiction and The Guitar Cafe.  

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/badfiction 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the-guitar-cafe