Re: footswitchable series/parallel signal routing schemes

["Doug Cox" <dougcox@pdq.net>]

I don't see how you get a parallel configuration out of this.  

A = serial, headrush and then RC20
B = bypass the RC20
A+B = serial (headrush then RC20), mixed with a straight signal

What am I missing?

Doug
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg House" <ghunicycle@yahoo.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: footswitchable series/parallel signal routing schemes


> --- Tim Nelson <psychle62@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I've been trying to come up with a simple way to route
> > a couple of loopers so that one footswitch will select
> > between running them in parallel, each with their own
> > output destination, and with running them in series,
> > one (a Headrush) cascaded into another (an RC-20), but
> > so far my experiments have been pretty frustrating.
> 
> What about a simple A/B split? For example:
> 
> instrument -> headrush -> A/B box: A -> RC20 -> passive mixer input 1
>                           A/B box: B -> passive mixer input 2
> 
> passive mixer out -> other gear -> amp
> 
> Greg
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>