Support |
> I thought I saw (back in the late 80's probably) a > product that was a really inexpensive midi/audio > codec. I'd love to explore the limits of what could > be done with something crude like that- I'm sure it > would suggest some new tangents. If I could afford > a Kyma, I'd be too distracted to imagine midi loopers, > I think 8-) at least for a year or so. (send > donations to my paypal account) Yes! I think it would be great fun to play around with a MIDI/audio codec. Hope you can find one (through the web, all is possible...). > Even if one got something like this going, without > some kind of intelligent algorythm to reduce velocity > values and then delete notes when they fall below a > certain velocity or volume value the system would > overload and do "something" eventually (that would > be interesting). Yes, that would be very tricky with such a scheme as we talking about. Maybe you could have the output side of the codec "attenuate" the note velocities, then use a recirculating delay set-up (instead of a looper per se). You could use a MIDI merger ahead of the input codec to combine the output and new MIDI. Hmm.... > If one were to record and delay dc control voltages > (I know of at least two examples of functioning units > based on this principle for driving analog synths > back in pre-midi days) wouldn't that necessarily > exclude polyphonic midi, or am I missing something. > If one had to multiplex voltages to get polyphony, > I don't know how that would compare to converting > midi to audio in complexity. Since MIDI is already serialized, probably a MIDI note to CV conversion would work fine (or at least as well poly as MIDI is). Intriguingly, Dennis Leas ----------- dennis@mail.worldserver.com