Support |
Paul, They may not be mapping the values using an algorithm, it might be a table they created that has values that somehow made sense to them. I work for a company that makes large format digital mixers and we use tables for mapping hardware controls (fader for example) to what they control (level) because an even spread of values (from a calculation) does not 'sound right'. Also, my calculation only used two decimal places, and increasing the number of decimal places will change a few of the mappings, but it doesn't shift them like the number you gave would require. I'm going to try and dig up some data on the relationship of tempo changing -> pitch shifting. I'll check the web and ask a few of the dsp guys here if they have any ideas... peace -cpr >-- Original Message -- >Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 23:43:38 +0000 >Subject: Re: BPM & Pitch Shift on Repeater >From: Paul Greenstein <paul@ubiq.co.uk> >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > > >Chris - thanks for the txt file. I see what you mean about the zero >values, your numbers make sense, the value I mentioned was from the >Repeater manual. Possibly the wording is misleading. I will continue >experimenting... > >Paul >