Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Awe, that sucks. It looks cool and promising. Thanks for the info. Mark On Jul 2, 2004, at 6:59 AM, Shane Whitbread wrote: > The philtre is a excellent post looper fx. The faze just > kinda.....stinks. > I regret buying it. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "msottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 2:54 PM > Subject: Stereo-zation > > >> Yup, sorry Stanitarium! I DO LOVE THE STEREO CHORUS SOUND! >> >> After playing with the EH-16 a bunch yesterday, I realized that as >> well >> as being a cool mono looper for playing live, it also sits nicely in >> my >> studio for extra looping fun. At one point I had asynchronous loops >> going on the EH-16, Gigadelay (Not true about the tone control, it's >> neutral when at 12:00) and lastly the 8 sec looper on board the Vox >> Tonelab SE. I could have had my Repeater going as well, but I didn't >> want to get greedy! >> >> So my question is this: The EH-16 doesn't have the lo-fi "feature" of >> it's father, but I do notice the monoization of my lush stereo >> chorused >> sounds. Again, not a big deal when playing live but in the studio I'm >> thinking I'd like to be able to post process the output of the EH16. >> I'd like it to be small and cheap, if possible. I'm thinking of one >> of >> those cheap little Alesis effects that do stereo modulation. (the >> Alesis FAZE) Anyone try one of these? >> >> Should I hold out for something like a nanoverb? Is the Line6 MM-4 >> worth it? Basically I want mono in, stereo out. Nothing too fancy. >> >> Mark >> >