Support |
Hi guys, about this whole MAC vs PC thing. I used to sell Audio PCs some time ago. Of course my PCs worked. But with the right hardware and setup. They werent much cheaper than a MAC. But alot faster. Now with the release of the G5 the speed issue changed. I like to tweak my PC and program alot. So I'll stay to my PC. It works great and runs 100% stable with nuendo and RME hardware. If you just want to plugin and start without tweaking and taking care of your system. Go and buy a Mac. That doesnt mean, the Mac won't crash ;) Both are professional solutions. But if you buy a really cheap PC (with really cheap motherboard and RAM) you probably will get some problems. Greetings Jens. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Sottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 4:37 PM Subject: Re: kim's post, yadda yadda yadda > On Aug 3, 2004, at 4:31 AM, loop.pool wrote: > > > Fry's had a deal last week on a > > P4 1.8 mghz PC with 512 megs of RAM, a 40 gig harddrive and a CD/RW > > burner/DVD player > > for $399. > > > > Tell me that Macs are cheaper than PCs. > > Will that machine do audio well? According to your previous posts > about your problems, probably not. I bought a really nice toaster oven > the other day for $100. It's also cheaper than a Mac, but doesn't work > well doing digital audio. > > > Now, Mark.........................let's be honest: > > > > what do extra hardrives and CD burners and printers and scanners cost > > for > > Macs?what do they cost for PCs? There is no denying that PCs are > > cheaper so > > let's call a spade a spade. > > Let's call a spade a spade. Macs now use IDE perfs as well as USB. > They cost *exactly the same* for both platforms. I have no idea what > you're talking about chum. I think you're thinking of 1995 when Macs > used SCSI and ADB. > > > I totally get that Macs are easier to run out of the box, but if you > > are > > comparing buying > > used Macs and used 828s then you have to apply the same standards to > > used > > PCs where the prices are even cheaper (except for the break out boxes). > > Read Rick. One word after the other. You know, like drums. Te te, te > te, ta. The link I offered was for a brand new (although discontinued > but still viable) G4 as well as the best price I could find with the > 828mkII > > > > > I really don't want to be coming off as being down on the > > Macs.................I just get a little sick and tired of the > > superiority > > that a lot of Mac users exhibit towards Windows users. > > I'm a lot sick of PC users complaining about how they can't figure out > what to buy or getting what they bought to work. Let's be sick > together! > > > > > We all do the best we can with the tools that we have and afford. > > It's > > easy to sit high and mighty; judging other's below your economic > > status for > > their compromises when you have a really nice salary, but not everyone > > is > > where you are at financially, Mark (and I know that you aren't even in > > the > > upper middle class in your economic bracket) > > I don't no, I was making music on a Mac when I was in college making > $5000 a year working part time in a sock store. That wasn't so long > ago. I didn't have the software selection that PC users did, but I > honestly had no choice going into graphics. There are still issues > with color proofing on the PC that makes it unusable for what I do. > > > I have tried, over and over, in this discussion to give respect and to > > praise the benefits of the wonderful Mac OS X. > > It would be nice for someone from that camp (and I NEVER hear it from > > them) > > that there might be some reasons why people chose the PC. > > Why? PCs don't seem to have trouble flying off the shelf. Everyone > knows they do simply because they're cheap. > > > > > Stratocasters versus Les Pauls. They can both be great and we use > > what > > tools we have to be creative. > > Les Pauls are horribly overpriced but they do incredible things (things > > Stratocasters can't do). Should I put someone down for using one if > > they > > can afford it? Was Hendrix fucked for using one (and supporting the > > economic status quo for doing it?). > > I don't even think that argument applies. We're talking about > platforms for computers. > > > > > It should really be about what we create, I think. > > > > > > Me too. > > Mark >