Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
>On Oct 13, 2004, at 7:50 AM, Travis Hartnett wrote: > >>Perhaps I missed it, but what exactly are you having problems with >>regarding the EDP? Between the manual, the online FAQs and >>knowledge base here, I think there's a ready answer to most >>questions. Larry Cooperman said: >My problem is the free association and lack of organization of the >thing. The language is secondary but it is a bit idiosyncratic of >an artist which makes Kim more respectable to me but not while I'm >reading the manual. maybe your problem is not with Kim who wrote the manual but with me who created most of the content. I prefered it to be intuitive rather than logic. this was an amazing experience. maybe the funcionality fits less to your focussed music, but you will find enough... Daniel Erni http://danielerni.ch did some amazing compositions with classical guitar. >I also understand, and I've known this for a long time, that the >more canned the more dried of blood and guts. your language is not easy to understand for me either :-) also: "church lady"? > That's my main area of inquiry into the whole looping thing. What >is we're looking for as looping artists? I've used terms like >masturbation and self aggrandizing and lumping myself into those >descriptions when I consider looping but I am an adult and use >language that may be a bit unnerving to those who are following some >kind of holy writ of looping that may unconsciously exist. big question, really. masturbation is a good thing. aggrandizing and lumping also meet strong parts of the experience. Instant (soul/mood) mirror is still the strongest and most holy for me. -- ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org