Support |
Sorry Travis, I didn't mean to upset. I'm a bit biased towards the dance end of this equation, I guess, as my wife is a long time choreographer of elegant, complex, and physically demanding modern dance. (Someone who counts LaLaLa and Sankai Juku as major influences...if you're familiar with these groups...you know 'that shit is hard'. Like a musician using someone like Beethoven or Miles as their benchmark) Anywho... in my opinion, if you want to have the benefit and enjoyment of the collaboration with modern dance, we, as musicians, are going to need to bend a bit more, rather than the other way around. Especially in regards to improv. Improv is often used as an idea generating device for dance. To try to do it "real-time" can be a number of things, especially with inexperienced or less-than-stellar dancers. It can be dangerous. It can be unfruitful. It can be REALLY BAD. I've seen it be all of these things. I'm not denying anybody's personal experiences, and I'm sorry if that came across in regards to you. It's just one thing for musicians to throw frequencies at each other, and another for a choreographer to be throwing flesh and bone at each other. I think we need to be understanding of that. As for the 'no great effort expended to match the running lengths' thing...well...that may have been something disrespectful towards you on the part of the people you worked with. On the other hand, again, I think we need to bend a bit there. It's quite presumptious to think that dancers are going to essentially move to a 'click track' of timing accuracy. Modern dance breathes...it slows down, speeds up. Dynamics are an essential part of the medium. Thus, sometimes pieces go too long, or too short. I've seen dancers eliminate whole phrases of a piece if they've gone over, just so they hit their exit and light cues right. Just as easily, the choreographer could be steaming at the side of the stage... "how come you eliminated my last lift?!?" Plus, there is a boatload of logistics to be taken into account as a dancer on stage. Don't miss that cue, point your feet, be sure you lift her about 4 inches from her knee or she'll fall over kind of stuff. Ever wonder why they don't allow flash photography at dance concerts? Imagine being blinded while someone is heading at you at a full run and you're expected to 'catch' them...and make it look good while you're at it. Funny you mention Bob Fosse. Because if we want lock-tempo rhythmic accuracy between music and dance...heck, that's all the rage. Jazz Dance + stripper/bellydance + plus hip hop popping and locking = Britney et al. Just add a twist of Antares Auto-Tune and you're all set! Anyway, time for me to shut up... With respect, Rich -----Original Message----- From: Travis Hartnett [mailto:tiktok@sprintmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:31 PM To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: Re: dancers Hence the "in my experience..." preface to my comments. I'd attend rehearsals, and more than half the time no music was used while they were working up the pieces. There's nothing wrong with this, it's just a different way of working. But, if as a musician you're expecting there to be sync between you and the dancers, then you'd be disappointed. For the live music I provided, they'd usually indicate a piece of one of my improvised CDs and say "Something in that vein..." Sometimes I'd get instructions for "build as we got to this point" but nothing more explicit. These were not Bob Fosse pieces. I'd put together CD-R's with the program music for these groups also, and I'd see multiple performances, and there was no great effort expended to match the running lengths of the pieces many times. If the dancers "finished" ten or twenty seconds before the music, they made do, or the soundman would be instructed to quickly fade down the music. >first off, I think that's not fair to modern dancers to lump them all in a group and judge them en masse. The same thing could be >said that "loop based musician's can't perform in real-time with a whole band and work with tempo changes". __________ NOD32 1.931 (20041123) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.nod32.com