Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

new looper?



Bob -

Are there any further details you feel comfortable disclosing at this time?

David

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Amstadt" <bob@amstadt.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: AW: Electrix Announces....


> Expect another looper on the market in a couple of months.  Development 
>is
> going well and I expect to have a prototype completed in about a month.
>
> --On Saturday, January 15, 2005 10:57 AM -0800 mark sottilaro
> <marksottilaro@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > Hm, I could be wrong, but with the Repeater some blank
> > space is put before and after each loop so that you
> > can go back and tweak your loop in and out point.
> > This takes time and is what currently makes it
> > impossible to go directly into record.  I'd easily
> > lose the loop tweak functions as I find the LPA (loop
> > point assist) stretching function to work fine for me.
> >  All this speculation!  Exciting times though.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > --- Luca Formentini <luca@unguitar.com> wrote:
> >
> >> right Rainer !
> >> I agree
> >> luca
> >>
> >> www.unguitar.com
> >>
> >> Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yet, for me, only providing the possibility to go
> >> directly into overdub
> >> > after recording a loop would be "a big jump forward
> >> from the
> >> > functionality of the original unit".
> >> >
> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > Von: Travis Hartnett [mailto:tiktok@sprintmail.com]
> >>
> >> > Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Januar 2005 17:49
> >> > An: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> >> > Betreff: Re: Electrix Announces....
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm no accountant, but maybe they managed to wave
> >> the magic wand of
> >> > debt restructuring so now they have no R&D costs to
> >> recoup?  And yeah,
> >> > it's probably made in China now to lower
> >> manufacturing costs.
> >> >
> >> > After filtering marketing speak, their description
> >> of the new version
> >> > sounded to me like "Fixed some bugs in OS 1.1 and
> >> put a pretty
> >> > faceplate on".  More power to them if that's true,
> >> but I'm not
> >> > expecting a big jump forward from the functionality
> >> of the original
> >> > unit.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Jan 15, 2005, at 8:39 AM,
> >> > Loopers-Delight-d-request@loopers-delight.com
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> From: "jondrums" <jondrums@hotmail.com>
> >> >> Date: January 14, 2005 10:08:57 AM PST
> >> >> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> >> >> Subject: Re: Electrix Announces....
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> always plenty of them).  If Electrix lost money
> >> manufacturing these
> >> >>> things and selling them for $300-400 how are they
> >> going to make any
> >> >>> money selling them this time around?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >> Maybe they moved production offshore and reduced
> >> manufacturing cost on
> >> >> them? One would hope that they've tackled the
> >> little problem of making
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> a profit...
> >> >> Jon
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > .
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>