Support |
Aw, yes…the old “sitting vs. standing” conundrum… I do both, sometimes at the same gig. As Ted pointed out, it is important to “play the gig”. As an Artist In Residence for the California Arts Council, I frequently get gigs at art galleries and museums; often being background music for openings and receptions. I also have a regular restaurant gig where I perform basically as background music for dining. In these cases I am not, nor is the music I am playing, the “focus” of the events. In such cases I sit (tho’ at times I do get up offa that seat and get funky…), and blend into the background. For solo shows, where the focus is my playing, I usually stand. The reason here is “the show” (and as this thread is melding into one on stage presence, I will address that as well). For the most part, audiences are not so mesmerized by looping gear, technology or techniques. Our culture has greatly elevated the performance, or “show” aspects of musical performance and, like it or not, most audiences expect to be entertained. >From time to time you can, and will, encounter audiences for who the >aural phenomenon of music is priority; or those who are rapt by the skill of a musician applying his/her craft. But even so, the entertainment factor does weigh in. For solo performers, and us loopists, this is particularly problematic. Often, when watching other loopists at work, I am quite aware at how many of us are somewhat oblivious to the audience (and I have been particularly guilty of this in the past). Granted, whether the audience is aware of it or not, what we do with loops is not particularly easy (timing is always a tricky issue). When playing in an ensemble, guitarists, bassists, singers, and even those awardees of great slack, drummers, are afforded the luxury of having comrades to “cover” timing issues, lapses of concentration , and the (somewhat dreaded ) “entertainment” factor. Playing solo, and this is augmented by both the tactile and technological problems of using loops in a solo context, illuminates these problems exponentially. As to the question of stage presence and of sitting/standing, in all situations (save for the aforementioned cases where I consciously try to blend into the background) I strive to be engaged with the audience. Three members of our list who excel at this, and have greatly influenced me here, are Rick, Bill Walker and Steve Lawson. All three of these inject a sense of humor and irony into their performances, engaging the audience, making light of their errors (sometimes giving focus to their trainwrecks), and making the sometimes cerebral act of looping more entertaining without stooping to the cliché rock-guitar type of posturing (although I have seen all three mockingly do this as well…)…and let’s face it, some of those now cliché gestures (grimaces, the tossing back of the head and feigned intensity are really just downright embarrassing). A performance is a statement. It has import. As performers it is necessary to acknowledge our audiences, to recognize their intelligence and appreciate their patronage. Our level of entertaining that audience can greatly vary. The simple act of standing and moving about after being seated for a time can generate a visual interest. Making eye contact with the audience, laughing, making off-hand quips, or even pausing your playing to listen to the loop and “actively contemplate” your next move can all greatly enhance an audience’s interaction with your performance. A few years back I did some duet shows with our prodigal son, Andre LaFosse. At the time he was using an old Roland drum Machine to manually “randomize” the processing of his EDP loops (knowing Andre, I tend to think that most of this was hardly random.). That alone could have been sonically novel and intriguing, yet he took it a step further by placing that machine on a stand in the center of the stage, and walking around it dramatically pondering the sounds of his loopage, before rushing to the machine with both hands and chaotically “playing” the buttons of the machine (which in turn would do amazing things to the sound of his guitar loops…). It was at the same time aurally intense, innovative, visually stimulating and theatrically entertaining. Max