Support |
While the inital reason that thread got started was (as we all agree) completely stupid, I think it might be worth while to talk about the fact that sometime your initial reaction to a form of art is often vastly different than where you end up. My theory is that art is a form of language. Perhaps where language starts, almost a "proto-language." As we mature we grow acustom to the language of our culture. Other culture's language sound like gibberish and are ignored and rejected... until needed. You see it all the time when a modern term (this happens a lot with science terms) is used by many languages Art, like language is in constant flux and barrowing from other movements as languages barrow from each other. Artists produce the raw material, or proto-language that a culture looks to and either takes what is useful or rejects what is not. That's how something like "Dada" can start as an esoteric experimental genera, and end up in pop culture via MTV decades later. In the same way, you can listen to "beeps and boops" and reject it at some point, and later embrace it when you begin to understand it, or find a need to express something that your current language(s) doesn't do well enough. Anyway, that's my rambling for the day. Mark