Support |
>> If you feel your work is misinterpreted then its your job as artist to make sure it doesn't get misinterpreted next time. You do that by making better art, not by crying 'foul' at the audience. > This is a curious thing. I happen to agree with it (especially taking it out of context of the discussion-I haven't heard Kris' music). I think it goes both ways. Last Wednesday, my loop show to me was a tragic failure, yet the audience really liked it. I had requests to get on the mailing list (which I don't have) and for recordings (which I didn't bring). However, had I made "better art" and been satisfied by my own performance, would I have gotten the positive audience reaction? Should I cry foul at the audience for liking what I did? Hi Edwin... I've had MANY similar instances in more esoteric ensembles as well as good 'ol rock bands. My take on it is that the AUDIENCE is ultimately the real judge of your music in a public context. The second thing is that I believe *desperation* from the performer is many times picked up as a passionate, intimate, intense, cathartic (you name your emotion) experience... lending validation that some real emotional event took place. You could be crying up there, and they'll rush up and regale you with various compliments and enthusiasm. It's perverse in it's irony... They like it RAW baby! That's just the way it is... -Miko now playing: Rough - biffoz www.cdbaby.com/biffoz