Support |
Wow, I've learned a lot from this thread. I discovered yesterday that the mpg files that I ripped from my looping DVD were of this nature: > File type: .mpg (MPEG-2) > Data rate: 1666 KB/Sec > Frame Rate: 29.97 fps > Video size: 720 X 480 So, I guess it was better that I went to MPEG-2 and not MPEG-4. I don't think my program had the MPEG-4 option, but the MPEG-2 seem to look fine, even when I burn back to DVD. In fact, this is what I did for my promo DVD. So is .avi even better than all of these because it is not compressed? I noticed my USB enabled microscope and software program converts my microbiological videos to .avi,and they are huge! If figured they might be the video version of a .wav file, the raw deal. Incidentally, I was experimenting with the trial-ware for Sorensen, than realized that I had Adobe Premier 6.0...I forgot....whoops. It has a cool Real Audio integration function called Cleaner, and a great wizard for exporting my MPEG-2 files as Real Audio, but Primier also allows me to export to windows media and Quick-Time as well, and I think a few other formats. So far, so good...keeping the quality I wanted and the file size down. The only downfall is the the Primier rendering time is horendous! I could have lunch and take a nap in between each file converstion. Cheers, Kris ________________________________ From: goddard.duncan@mtvne.com [mailto:goddard.duncan@mtvne.com] Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:03 AM To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: RE: OT- Loop Videos / How to get file size down! >> I can see and edit both audio and video separately with these large .mpg files that I rip from DVD. You were saying that you don't get this with mpeg, correct? << mpg & mpeg are the same thing. mpg is one of the file extensions used by mpeg files. just like jpg & jpeg, in fact. joint picture experts group & motion picture experts group, from whence we get these acronyms, were cross-industry bodies established to define (by a combination of committee & consensus) a series of standards for exchange of media. the jpeg one was reasonably straightforward, though we've still ended up with a few different flavours. mpeg is another matter. it evolved from m-jpeg (motion jpeg) & differs from it crucially in that motion interpolation is performed to further reduce file size. thus, if there isn't much difference between one frame & the next (i.e. not much movement), only the differences need be encoded. all this "council" could do meaningfully, given that requirements vary from mobile/broadband right through to digital cinema, was establish a set of fairly rigid guidelines for each version of mpeg, defining how the files were to be constructed, what media elements each could include & so forth. bitrates are left to the user. mpeg-1 was the first stab at it, & layer-3 of mpeg-1 is the bit that carries the audio. nowadays this is known as mp3. mpeg-2 was a significant improvement, introducing b & p frames (so that the interpolation amongst frames is bidirectional; the frames have to be sent to the decoder in the wrong order for this to work, which is why mpeg-2 as used for live television broadcasts has so much latency). mpeg-2 is also used for dvd. does anyone know the difference between m-jpeg & i-frame-only-mpeg-2? :-) there isn't an mpeg-3 because of the widespread misuse of the abbreviation mp3 to refer to the layer 3 (audio) component of mpeg-1. mpeg-4 is the latest flavour in serious use, exploiting better compression algorithms that have come along recently, though it has yet to be demonstrated as useful to high-end users. wm9 rivals it & looks the likelier of the two to be adopted for broadcast. there are other flavours of mpeg too- 7, 21.... some of these are designed to use media that's already stored in the decoder- bitmaps, fractals & so on- to reconstruct sound & images using a set of instructions that's sent in place of much of the raw data. google away. ok. enough. back to looping. duncan/r.m.i. & mtv. ************************************************************************ *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed, and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee of this e-mail you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any form whatsoever.If you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail the sender by replying to this message. It is your responsibility to carry out appropriate virus and other checks to ensure that this message and any attachments do not affect your systems / data. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of MTV Networks Europe unless specifically stated, nor does this message form any part of any contract unless so stated. MTV reserves the right to monitor e-mail communications from external/internal sources for the purposes of ensuring correct and appropriate use of MTV communication equipment. MTV Networks Europe ************************************************************************ ***