Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
> This is interesting. I could never let go of a rig that supported me in > creating the kind of sounds you did! Sorry, Mistake: I intented to write "instrument" not "instruments", so the only device I sold was the modular. The rest still belongs to me (so my maindevice is now the t.c. G - major and the editing of digital recorded devices via Plug Ins such as the InaGRM - Series). "But I'm convinced that, at a live performance, if you're focussed and manage to focus the audience, too, and draw from the emerging energy, the sound will be far beyond those 10%, even beyond 100% ;)." Yeah, but you canīt control automated processes in way, as 4 musicians - for example in a jazz environment do - can interact with themselfes. Look: Take a bird and take a airplane. 1.) genius: nature 2.) apes in a metal box trying to be a bird. In a way, Improvisers managing to master their tonal instruments over years of practising are the better machines (as the classic symphony orchetra is a better "synthesizer" for the composer than every modular can) than some Roland or echoplex - chips. I believe in electronic technology, but it needs a situation as in laboratory life (and this is were it emerged historically, next to edison, bell laboratories and other universities: it is more about experimentation then about life performing, that comes out of a more medieval/christian culture in western terms or religious or folk - rituals in a more universal focus). And take a string - quartett - aesthetic, isnīt it? People behind knobes? Not so much ladies in the audience, right? Uuuh, heavy discussion themes emerging.... Cheers, Johannes