[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: means to an end (was "the diatonic-chromatic-noise paradigm")

To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
From: "Kevin Cheli-Colando" <kevin@minds-eye.org>
Subject: RE: means to an end (was "the diatonic-chromatic-noise paradigm")
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:12:15 -0600

Yes you did.  I didn't read your response closely enough before I sent
my message.  Sorry about that.  Anything before 10:00 am is still too
early for me I'm afraid.

> Kevin - I  did qualify "from an emotional respective" and "borderline",
> did I not?  

Kevin

How amazing, how amazing!
Hard to comprehend that
Nonsentient beings expound Dharma.
It simply cannot be heard with the ear,
But when sound is heard with the eye,
Then it is understood.
- Tung-shan (807-869)

Sound and Vision:    http://www.minds-eye.org

Prev by Date: Re: maybe yes, maybe know
Next by Date: Re: AW: in praise of looping with the Electrix Mo-FX
Previous by Thread: RE: means to an end (was "the diatonic-chromatic-noise paradigm")
Next by Thread: RE: means to an end (was "the diatonic-chromatic-noise paradigm")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author