Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Mobius on the Receptor (was Repeater-- Speculation and disinformation)



Better yet, PSP84. I like that versi0n much more than PSP42..much more
powerful, but also processing intensive.  PSP84 is laced through most all 
my
live recordings  in the last 8 months. You do mean the current VST plugins,
right?

Kris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Per Boysen" <per@boysen.se>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:58 AM
Subject: Re: Mobius on the Receptor (was Repeater-- Speculation and
disinformation)


Don't you thing the Lexicon PSP42 would be cool with the Receptor?

Greetings from Sweden

Per Boysen
www.looproom.com (international)
www.boysen.se (Swedish)
--->  iTunes Music Store (digital)
www.cdbaby.com/perboysen




On Oct 14, 2005, at 4:43, Kelly Coyle wrote:

> Will do. A guy can dream...
>
> Loopy Llama does run. It's more of a JamMan style looper than an
> EDP style looper. That's my fallback option. I'm really hoping for
> Mobius, of course. There's also lots of Fripp-inspired tape delay
> simulations, FWIW, and a lot of the more complicated delays have
> loop-like options (see OhmBoyz). One downside is that the Receptor
> has the Worlds Most Stupid MIDI ImplementationŠ. They're supposed
> to fix that, to some extent, in the next software revision. I want
> the Receptor regardless of Mobius, but it would be killer with it.
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2005, at 9:20 PM, Jeff Larson wrote:
>
>
>> Kelly Coyle wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hey, since I'm here, I'm awaiting a Receptor. I'm eager to see
>>> if  Mobius will run on it. Loopy Llama does, anyway, along with a
>>> lot of  pretty cool delays. I'll post if it does (or not) when I
>>> can test it  (once I get it).
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Sorry to disappoint you but I'm fairly certain Mobius will not run
>> on a Receptor.  Mobius was originally designed as a standalone
>> application and as such it is not a "pure" VST plugin.  In particular
>> it does not use VSTGUI, a popular cross-platform user interface
>> toolkit
>> that a lot of plugins use.  Some of the synchronization features also
>> require that it make direct contact with Windows MIDI devices
>> which is
>> not allowed in portable VSTs.
>>
>> Unless they've done a spectacular job on their Windows emulator
>> (Receptor internally runs Linux) I doubt it will work.   If you
>> get any diagnostic messages with details about what Receptor didn't
>> like I'd like to see them.
>>
>> Jeff