Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

AW: Building a rackmount looping computer as an alternative to the Receptor for Mobius



So your definition of pro or non-pro is entirely based on the economics.
Which would make somebody living off welfare and at the same time trying
to get somebody interested in their entirely unprofessional art is a
professional, while somebody like e.g. Bryan Beller (of Mike
Keneally/Beer for Dolphins, Z, Steve Vai, Mullmuzzler/Jamie LaBrie etc.)
isn't (or at least hasn't been until shortly).

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Travis Hartnett [mailto:travishartnett@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2005 17:45
An: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Betreff: Re: Building a rackmount looping computer as an alternative to
the Receptor for Mobius


In the world of musicians, the term "professional" gets thrown around
with abandon, and is often used to denote how "serious" someone is in
their musical endeavours.  I'm not intending a slight to musicians who
can't make ends meet soley through their music, I'm just applying a more
precise definition than is often used.

A guy who works as a waiter while putting himself through college can be
described as a professional waiter, or even a student, but not as a
"professional architect", even if he's attending architecture school,
and even if he really, really likes to draw buildings and has his own
drafting table and a large collection of pencils.

As far as I'm concerned, the same applies to musicians.  Your
"profession" is what you make your living at, your self-definition can
be an entirely different thing.  "Turning pro" usually means "I've quit
my day job".  If you've got a W-2 with something other than "musician"
listed on it, you're semi-pro.  It doesn't mean that you're less of a
musician, just that your involvement in the economic realm of
music-making is below a certain threshold.

TravisH

On 10/16/05, paul <phaslem@wightman.ca> wrote:
> Travis, I really am surprised by your very narrow definition of a 
> professional musician! I made my sole living playing music for over 
> ten years, I don't consider myself any less professional now. I think 
> anyone who is taking their music seriously, is expected to be paid 
> when asked to perform, is a professional musician. That may make an 
> interesting question to ask, How do you define what a professional 
> musician is? By your definition, I guess that I couldn't even be 
> called a professional plumber since I don't make enough to cover our 
> bills and need my wife to supplement our income.