Support |
>Secondly, remember, a 2.3gHz for a Centrino based notebook performs a >lot more efficiently than a 2.3gHz non-Centrino Intel based processor. >This literally screams past the MAC 1.6gHz. Did you know that MAC plans >to use Intel processors in their future desktops? Why would they do >this? Because Intil keeps pushing the edge of processor performance >and MAC wants a piece of the action. As I heard it, the PowerPC platform has been targeting an entirely different platform (automotive/industry, communications and game consoles) and as such, Apple didn't get the products they wanted/needed.