Support |
Travis -
Thanks for this, but <sigh!> now I'm lost again. That's
what I've been trying to do: end recording on loop2 and go
back to playing on loop1 without touching loop3 or loop4.
What's your suggestion on how to accomplish this?
- Sam
--- Travis Hartnett <travishartnett@gmail.com > wrote:
> You could still have more than 2 loops, but you'd have to
> change your
> arrangement so that you ended record or overdub before
> leaving loop2.
>
> TravisH
>
> On 11/1/05, Sam Rogers <onemouthband@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Andy, Jeff, and other off-board replies. I
> think
> > I'll take the simplest part of Andy's advice and just
> try
> > to rework my arrangement with MoreLoops=2 for now
> (though I
> > hate to sacrifice those vocal harmonies!). You've
> given me
> > a lot to play with and think about, and you're right it
> has
> > nothing to do with MultiIncrease.
> >
> > It's just frustrating whenever you make a software
> upgrade
> > that takes away previous functionality. I had performed
> my
> > previous (LoopIII) arrangment and liked it that way.
> But
> > when I tried it in LoopIV it sent me into
> MultiIncrease,
> > that's why I was focused on MultiIncrease as the
> solution
> > to the exclusion of other options. Thanks again for
> > opening me up!
> >
> > Sam Rogers
> > One Mouth Band
> > www.OneMouthBand.com
> >
> >
>