Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
>From audiofanzine.fr:
xml exemple: "Loop 22211 2 1 Stop"
The number in the song setup file for tempo is in Samples/beat. Since
the JamMan runs at 44100, the calculation is 60*44100/BPM, or
2646000/BPM. So the correct value for 100 BPM is 2646000/100 = 26460.
It's a start ;-)
Ben.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelly Coyle" <kellycoyle@charter.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: Digitech Jam Man
> What an interesting idea! I wonder if DigiTech wouldn't just give you
> the file structure -- it adds value to the box, after all. You could
> use the thing like a weird little sampler... If you figure this out,
> don't keep it a secret.
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 30, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Dennis Moser wrote:
>
>> Well, I've read through everything I could find in the archives
>> (searching both "Jamman" and "Jam Man"), but nothing to indicate that
>> anyone has looked at what I am trying to research on this box.
>>
>> The discussion about the perceived market for this device are
>> revealing: the traditional loopers tools are, by comparison, pricey, a
>> little antiquated, and have limited storage capacity, due to the
>> existing technology (now, don't jump on me...I own a Lexicon Vortex
>> and have two more coming). One area where this box seems to be able to
>> do a good job is allowing a performer to load up looops in advance,
>> take them in to a performance and play "against" them.
>>
>> And therein lie my questions: has anyone tried hacking the XML files
>> that the box generates with each WAV file that together comprise your
>> loop? The XML files contain parameters such as rhythm and time...and
>> since these can be edited with a text editor such as BBEdit, I'm
>> trying to understand if I can perform a kind of "post-loooping" hack
>> on them. I have, in the first 24 hours with this box, already done
>> this with the WAV file, taking a simple guitar riff, running it
>> through a bit of software to reverse it, saved it back as a
>> now-reversed loop and had it run just fine on the box. (Actually did
>> it in the first 15 minutes with it out of the box!)
>>
>> And as I sit here, listening to Steve Roach's "Structures from
>> Silence", I'm sure I'm asking for trouble from this sage group!
>>
>> Dennis Moser
>>
>> The next goal is to see if I can now control other parameters stored
>> inthe XML files...
>>
>> On 10/30/05, Per Boysen <per@boysen.se> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:27, Dennis Moser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Just checked the archives of the list and the last discussion about
>>>> this box was in July...has anyone bought one of these yet and had a
>>>> chance to experiment with it?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Dennis Moser
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have one by me fore while to test it for reviewing in a mag. I just
>>> briefly plugged in an hour yesterday and need more time with the
>>> device before I can judge it. I will get that time in exactly one
>>> week from today. But the first impression I got is that the Jam Man
>>> is not addressing people that want to PLAY looping music as much as
>>> it addresses people that want to rehearse technical playing skills
>>> over a background.
>>>
>>> ings from Sweden
>>>
>>> Per Boysen
>>> www.looproom.com (international)
>>> www.boysen.se (Swedish)
>>> ---> iTunes Music Store (digital)
>>> www.cdbaby.com/perboysen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com