Support |
If memory serves (and I am certain there is someone on this list who will illustrate to me just where memory does not serve), our hearing is not stereo, but rather binaural. The diffrence being more than merely semantic as binaural does not "limit" things to merely a R/L mix, rather encompassing, like our own hearing, a full 360o sound field. The funny thing about sound is that it is not defined by its source, but rather by its target....hence that old riddle involving a tree which falls in the forest... Even a mono sound can be "heard" in stereo (or to be more correct, "binaurally"). And, I supopose next should come a call out for a "true binaural looper"! "Stereophonic Sound", as it used to be called, is actually a somewhat limited, and feeble, attempt to emulate (or even model?) the natural binaural hearing traits. Stereo is more a mental state than a physical state of "hearing". Even people who have lost hearing in one ear (and perhaps David Torn and Marcus Miller can attest to this) are still able to "hear" in stereo. And, while stereo does create an interesting and enhanced (albeit artificial) listening field, many people actually still prefer to listen in mono where timning, frequency and phase issues are not clouded or masked by the stereo image (how do you check your mixes?) Max