Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
"There was a DFX98 advertised, but a real life version never made it to the stores." Yes, Ernest, I remember waiting a whole year and bugging my local music store ad nauseum. Lots of catalog stores were be glad to take orders for what turned out to be a phantom product. I called DOD and they said they were hot to build it but their corporate overlords at Harman pulled the plug on the project after fanning the flames for all that time. ~Tim > [Original Message] > From: Ernest Smith <nowsmith@comcast.net> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Date: 11/24/2005 10:26:47 PM > Subject: Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey > > The 4 second looping pedal is the DOD DFX94. There is no FX94, AFAIK. > There was a DFX98 advertised, but a real life version never made it > to the stores. > On Nov 24, 2005, at 10:19 PM, Doug Cox wrote: > > > This is the same as a DOD FX94, right? > > > > I found that and added it to the list already. Please help me > > confirm - if they're different, I can list them separately, but > > would prefer to group them together if they're the same (or very > > close to the same). > > > > Thanks! > > > > Timothy Mungenast wrote: > > > > > >> Digitech DFX-94 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> [Original Message] > >>> From: Doug Cox <dougcox@pdq.net> > >>> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > >>> > >>> > >> <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > >> > >> > >>> Date: 11/23/2005 10:33:01 PM > >>> Subject: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey > >>> > >>> Hey Loopers - Happy Thanksgiving to you all. > >>> > >>> In November of 2003, we did a survey of the LD list members to > >>> find out what devices they were using for live looping. It was > >>> very informal and pretty disorganized (I think I still have a > >>> headache...), but I tallied the results into a spreadsheet and > >>> posted a PDF version of those results in the Looper's Delight > >>> File Library (http://www.loopers-delight.com/files/). > >>> > >>> It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try > >>> it again. This time, we won't clutter up the list (or my brain!) > >>> with the responses, but instead I'm preparing an online survey > >>> form to capture them. The survey will be anonymous (unlike 2 > >>> years ago), but the form WILL use cookies to ensure that surveys > >>> are only submitted once. Well, once per computer - but what > >>> would really be the point in trying to screw with this survey? :) > >>> > >>> I'll host the survey, and I give my personal assurances that the > >>> data written/read by the cookies will only be used to block > >>> multiple submissions. I will NOT provide this information to > >>> anyone else, and cannot see the contents of your cookie myself. > >>> > >>> I've started to prepare the form with the following loopers > >>> listed (see bottom). I'll take any suggested additions into the > >>> list until Saturday. At that point, I'll post the survey and > >>> leave it open for about a month so that we get the maximum number > >>> of respondents. > >>> > >>> You won't be able to "write in" a looper once I post the survey. > >>> I will continue to take offline (emailed) requests for off-list > >>> loopers after the survey starts, but I will have to add them to > >>> the results manually at the end of the survey. So please - take > >>> a look at this list and ask me to add anything YOU are using as a > >>> looper that is not represented. Part of the fun of this survey > >>> is to see what other unusual devices are being used. > >>> > >>> Finally - last year we had some confusion about what to include > >>> in the inventory. Some folks were posting gear that they used > >>> for loop *mangling* or pre/post loop effecting. There was also > >>> some confusion about "samplers" vs. "live loopers". I propose that: > >>> > >>> - we do NOT try to inventory effects devices used for per/post loop > >>> > >>> > >> effects > >> > >> > >>> - we do NOT try to inventory units used to playback prerecorded > >>> loops or samples > >>> > >>> Instead, if those things are of interest to others, we can start > >>> a new thread and post them - or perhaps I can setup another > >>> survey in the (distant) future to capture that data. > >>> > >>> Here's the list - let me know what needs to be added: > >>> > >>> *Echoplex Digital Pro > >>> Electrix Repeater > >>> Line 6 DL-4 > >>> Lexicon Jamman > >>> Digitech Jamman > >>> Kaoss Pad I or II > >>> Ableton Live > >>> Boomerang (Orig or Plus) > >>> Akai Headrush > >>> Boss RC-20 (or RC-20XL) > >>> Lexicon Vortex > >>> Line 6 Echo Pro (Rack) > >>> Zoom 2100 > >>> Lexicon PCM42 or PCM70 or other > >>> Boss DD-3, 5 or 6 > >>> Boss DD-20 > >>> Boss GT-3, 5, 6 or 8 > >>> Digitech RDS 7.6 (or similar, incl PDS series) > >>> Max MSP > >>> Native Instruments Reaktor > >>> Sonic Foundry Acid > >>> ZVEX Lofi Loop Junky > >>> Lexicon MPX G2 > >>> Digitech 2120 or 2112 > >>> Eventide Orville, Eclipse (or other) > >>> Roland VG8 or VG88 > >>> Roland GP100 (or similar) > >>> Audiomulch > >>> Augustus Loop > >>> Mobius > >>> Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) > >>> Radial > >>> Ambiloop > >>> Maneco Looper (any type) > >>> Digitech GNX (any) > >>> TC Electronic 2290 Delay > >>> DJRND3 (or C-Loops or Peavey Grabber) > >>> KYMA > >>> TC Electronic D-Two Delay > >>> Akai Samplers (any) > >>> Roland Samplers (any) > >>> Yamaha Samplers (any) > >>> Maestro, Roland, Guyatone, etc Tape Echo machine > >>> * > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >