Support |
Well, I'd definitely be interested in less sample/loop time to secure higher sampling rates up to 192kbps! From what I read, the Looperlative has lots of memory. I imagine heat and power consumption may become issues... Good luck with the design and coding. David P.S. As mentioned by someone else, USB 2 would be a great feature! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Amstadt" <bob@amstadt.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:17 PM Subject: Re: Looperlative LP1 - sample rate > The electronics in the LP1 are capable of sampling rates up to 192kbps. >I > have not actually run the unit at that speed, but I may experiment with >it > at a later date. The big reason that I didn't run it at that speed is that > as you increase sampling rate you also increase the amount memory >required > to store the audio. So, the LP1 will be hitting the streets with a >48kbps > sampling rate. > > --On Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:34 PM -0500 David Kirkdorffer > <vze2ncsr@verizon.net> wrote: > > > Ronan has a point - of course, my wish would be for a higher sample rates > > in the 196K range. But at this point, I can tell that would not be a > > possibility. Hey, that can wait for the Looperlative-Killer! :-) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ronan Chris Murphy" <looper@venetowest.com> > > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5:29 PM > > Subject: Re: Looperlative LP1 - sample rate > > > > > >> I checked out the web site and this box looks really cool! I saw that > >> the current sample rate is 48k, while sonically that is OK, if I was > >> building this box I would think seriously about 44.1. This could open > >> up more possibilities down the road for seamless compatibility via the > >> ethernet connection. It seems at some point you would be able to take > >> things off of CD and import them into Looperlative as loops, but more > >> importantly if you performed a really beautiful loop(s) on > >> Looperlative, it seems that you could at some point transfer that to > >> your computer and mix and or master from those files with out going > >> through a quality degrading re-sample to make it commercial CD > >> compatible. > >> > >> Ronan Chris Murphy > >> www.venetowest.com (Production & mixing: King Crimson, Chucho Valdes, > >> Steve Morse, Terry Bozzio, CGT...) > >> www.homerecordingbootcamp.com (Workshops around the world teaching the > >> art and craft of recording ) > >> www.livesofthesaints.net (The hottest ambient noise duo since Sonny & > >> Cher) > >> > >> > >> On Dec 13, 2005, at 12:28 PM, Bob Amstadt wrote: > >> > >> > MIDI sync is not in yet, but it is currently on the top of the list of > >> > software features to be added. > >> > > >> > Feedback control is in the current software and can be controlled from > >> > the front panel or via a foot pedal. MIDI button control of >feedback > >> > is on the list of features to be added. > >> > > >> > Manual faders exist for each track and can be controlled via the front > >> > panel or a foot pedal. Automatic fading is a feature on the >software > >> > to do list. > >> > > >> > --On Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:46 AM -0800 mark sottilaro > >> > <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> That does indeed sound like a Repeater/EDP killer! I > >> >> didn't see anything about it's ability to sync to a > >> >> MIDI clock or have variable feedback. Two "must have" > >> >> feature of a looper in my world. Man, if it did > >> >> direct to overdub... feedback control AND fade control > >> >> on each channel (have a loop fade while you start to > >> >> build another on another track) That would be sweet. > >> >> > >> >> Mark > >> >> > >> >> --- Doug Cox <dougcox@pdq.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Heya gang, > >> >>> > >> >>> Not that you couldn't go get this info with a bit of > >> >>> browsing, but I've > >> >>> compiled all of the things I could find here and at > >> >>> Bob's site into a > >> >>> blog post at my blog site. You're invited to come > >> >>> by and take a look if > >> >>> you want a condensed version of what we know so far. > >> >>> > >> >>> http://www.uncledig.com/blog/archives/44 > >> >>> > >> >>> I have Bob's blessing on this (thanks Bob!). > >> >>> > >> >>> There's also a chance that I'll be doing a phone > >> >>> interview with Bob > >> >>> sometime in the near future, and presenting that as > >> >>> an audioblog > >> >>> entry/podcast. Maybe even a series of interviews as > >> >>> the LP1 develops. > >> >>> No promises on that just yet - but I think we can > >> >>> figure something out. > >> >>> You're welcome to email me offlist if there are > >> >>> things you'd like to see > >> >>> addressed in an interview like that. > >> >>> > >> >>> Definitely planning some phone interviews with other > >> >>> loopstars from the > >> >>> list. I'll leave you in suspense on that one :) > >> >>> > >> >>> Also, if you snoop around, you'll see that I'm in > >> >>> the beta testing > >> >>> stages of an interesting musician's online community > >> >>> at the root of my > >> >>> domain (http://www.uncledig.com). It's just getting > >> >>> started, but if you > >> >>> read through it and like what you see, feel free to > >> >>> sign up and even > >> >>> post some of your music in the appropriate category. > >> >>> I'll post about > >> >>> this to the list again very soon, once I get all of > >> >>> the features fully > >> >>> tested and online. > >> >>> > >> >>> Loop on, loopsters. > >> >>> > >> >>> Doug > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> __________________________________________________ > >> >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >