Re: Looperlative Observations (and 1st post)

["mark t" <aleatoric12@gmail.com>]

I would not mind hearing some more first impressions/opions and or
audio clips from other on list LP1 users.

On 5/8/06, rabbirabbifive <rabbirabbi5@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi all, I've been lurking here for a while.  Since I am one of the
> first 30 or so people w/ a looperlative and some, uh, controversy has
> sprung up regarding it, I felt I should post.
>
> My way of looking at this is that you're buying a chance to be on the
> ground floor of a product's development.  Kinda like buying a modular
> from some guy named Moog back in the 60's. It's a chance to help shape
> something, rather than just getting a product off a shelf.  OTOH you're
> buying an unfinished product.  I am OK with that, because it already
> has enough functionality to be worth it for me.  I also know from
> experience that software engineering is never fast enough or bug-free
> enough.  That's the price you pay for being on the cutting edge.
> Sometimes you bleed.  If you bought it to do something it doesn't do
> yet, based on Bob's rather vague pronouncements, and you need it to do
> that RIGHT NOW, you will probably be dissapointed.  I am not faulting
> Bob here at all.  He has to be vague; that's just the nature of the
> beast.  Stick with him and I think it will do everything he has sort of
> promised it will do.  It will just take time.  As for when you can get
> one for 599, probably never, unless Bob gets sick of all this and sells
> out.  Which I hope he never does.
>
> (If you do get sick of it all Bob, just open-source the code.  You can
> still build the boxes...just spitballing here).
>
> My Two Cents,
> "Some Dude"
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>