Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I totally agree, in a sense fade would be better than feedback considering how feedback works on most loopers with old loop material getting a % softer with each pass of the loop instead of a gradual decrease like a timed fade could be. Here's the question, how does the RC-50 behave in terms of going from patch to patch while synced to a MIDI clock? Is it somewhat seamless? Can you cue up another patch to start at the endpoint of your current patch? If it did it would make this machine quite the mf'er. --- rc_firth <rc_firth@ntlworld.com> wrote: > Fade-out would not be the same as feedback. With > feedback the audio decays over the course of time > and is ultimately lost; a fade out should leave the > recorded audio intact, and still in memory. The plus > point on the RC-50, is that this gives you the > opportunity of fading the audio back in, which is > something I don't think is possible on most, or any > of the loopers with feedback control? We still need > to know if Boss has given us a useful parameter > range for the fade; they quote 0-100 in the manual, > and this is for fade-outs and fade-ins. But if for > example 0-100 equates to 0-10 secs, then it would be > virtually useless - give me 0-100 seconds and I > might bite; more would be a definite bonus. > > > mark sottilaro wrote: > > Is fade the same as feedback though? I guess if > you > have enough tracks you can fake it by setting > one to > fade while you start building another. Hell, if > that > works I'd buy this thing. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com