Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Well partially I was thinking that most of us with pro-sumer level audio interfaces wouldn't get the same high quality output that a dedicated machine might get. I could be totally wrong though, which is why I asked. If you're truely saying that for the price of a laptop (to use me as an example) ($1400), audio interface ($200) and Reaktor software ($300) I'd get something on par with an Exclipse, well then I'd be shaking in my boots if I was a hardware manufacture. M --- Bill Fox <billyfox@soundscapes.us> wrote: > mark sottilaro wrote: > > > All this talk about Eclipse/Fireworx vs. > Max/Reaktor > > made me think, surely dedicated hardware must > sound a > > lot better, no? Perhaps software is way more > flexible > > but is it as good? If all you got from hardware > was > > lower latency I'd imagine ebay would be flooded > with > > effects processors to the point people couldn't > give > > them away. I'm excited about what my humble laptop > > can do but will it rival even my modest Lexicon > MPX1 > > in terms of sound quality? > > Unless I'm not correctly understanding your > question, it seems to me > that you're asking about audio quality. This seems > like an odd > question, if it isn't a troll. ;-) Considering all > of the applications > a computer can do: play CDs, play DVDs, run > sequencers like Sonar and > ProTools, run Live, et al, audio quality shouldn't > even be an issue > unless an app is poorly written. Shouldn't you be > asking about timing, > latency, ease of operation? > > Cheers, > > Bill > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com