Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I'd say that's an excellent strategy. As much as I rely on my FCB1010, I don't love it, and I moved to a floor guitar effects processor/amp modeler because it gave me a degree of control and feedback that no MIDI controller would/could. If there was a compelling reason for the controller, I bet people would buy it, but make sure it's an option. (See my comments about the Korg Legacy collection controller) I can't wait to check your software. I know it's not even in beta yet but can you give use an idea of it's feature set? Mark --- aaron leese <aaronleese@hotmail.com> wrote: > How bout this: > > For those of us that already own midi controllers > (including people who > might want to control loops from a keyboard), I will > make this program midi > controller friendly. > > For anyone who doesn't already own a midi controller > ... (aka joe average > guitar player) there will be an optional USB device > that will also work with > the program (retailing at about the same price as > the FCB1010, say). This > device might include a few extra bells and whistles > that the midi controller > doesn't have, but nothing crucial (some effects > controls). > > That seems like a copacetic situation, no? > > Since this thread is getting older .. I want to > reiterate, that this is not > something I hope to have working someday ... it's > already out there > (www.flyloops.com). There will be a downloadable > beta version soon (once I > get midi controllers working). > > > > > > > > > > >From: a k butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> > >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > >Subject: Re:Re: FlyLooper & market potential > >Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:14:47 +0100 > > > > > >>Aaron is writing a software looper, and presumably > wants to make > >>money selling it. Instead of supporting MIDI like > practically every > >>other piece of music software in the world, he was > going to build his > >>own custom footswitch that would only work with > his software. > >> > >>Many, if not most, of the people that are going to > be interested in > >>this looper don't want another friggin' > footswitch. Not supporting > >>MIDI, at least as an option, is insane. > > > >with the standard "my2cents" disclaimer, and > respect to Jeff:- > > > >The advantage is presumably that the footswitch > works as a dongle, > >which is a useful consideration in profit terms. > > > >Doesn't that Korg Legacy thing rely on a similar > principle? > > > >I could imagine that having a nice light small > footswitch to work > >the looper, while using the laptop to set up FX & > sounds > >would be most acceptable for a portable rig. > > > >andy butler > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar � get > it now! > http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com