Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
//Really at this point why bother monkeying around with the RC-20 when a used Repeater can be purchased with is's own flawed OS?// It's the RC-50 I believe you're referring to? A disadvantage of using the Repeater is that of its hardware reliability, IMHO compared to the RC-50. Also, the RC-50 doesn't need a Behringer MIDI pedal (and the programming) needed to control it. The argument about feedback seems to be like someone complaining that a automobile is useless because it doesn't have a truckbed. So what? Many folks don't need a truckbed (or feedback). -- Paul Richards ---- mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > I agree. As much as I wanted to love the RC-20 for > it's form factor alone, I want to find someone at > Roland and punch them for not bothering to include > what a lot of people consider base functionality. > > Really at this point why bother monkeying around with > the RC-20 when a used Repeater can be purchased with > is's own flawed OS? ;) The quirky Repeater still > seems to be a better product than the RC-20 from what > I can see. If you really need something on the floor > you're probably better off with an Electro-Harmonix > 2880, no? > > --- Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Seriously, that workaround is as arcane as roland's > > O/S is to begin > > with. It hasn't changed my mind about the flawwed > > RC-50... > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >