Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
LOL as a street-busker am i a lower life form than a
coffee house player and is that any less rewarding
than the club performer or those who find themselves
touring the globe?what is the most evolved form of
loopage artist?
I'm glad to use any looping tool i can acquire and
maybe ill end up owning every looper on the market one
day.i think its a good thing that loopers(machines)are
like loopers(artist)every one is different and no two
are exactly the same.
its hard to avoid lobster traps when in unexplored
water, and its easy to over indulge on the chaos
factor sometimes.
capture the moment,
scary visionary.
p.s yes very insightfull and concise info
Buzap...kudos
--- mech <mech@m3ch.net> wrote:
> At 12:32 AM -0400 7/20/06, Jfloridis@aol.com wrote:
> >"If you're just a coffeehouse guitarist looping a
> few rhythm chucks
> >over which to lay a solo (and this is nothing
> against coffeehouse
> >guitarists -- there are some damn fine ones out
> there), then a looper
> >with no feedback is gonna work just fine."
> >
> >perhaps it's the just in "just a coffeehouse
> guitarist..." that
> >stings a little..... : )
>
> Agh! I hate that little word!!! I use it far too
> much -- I usually
> make it a point to go through and delete as many
> instances as
> possible when editing a post -- yet it still comes
> back to bite me no
> matter how many times I re-read before hitting send.
>
> Needless to say, that isn't what I meant at all.
> How about...
>
> Change: "If you're just a coffeehouse guitarist
> looping a few
> rhythm chucks...",
> to this: "If you're a coffeehouse guitarist just
> looping a
> few rhythm chucks...".
>
> Kinda changes the emphasis there. The latter is
> actually much closer
> to what I meant. Especially since I was really
> trying to go out of
> my way *not* to trivialize coffeehouse guitarists,
> then there I go
> and put my foot into a different beartrap. D'oh.
>
> 1000 pardons, Effendi!
>
> >as far as feedback with the rc50, the detailed
> descriptions in
> >buzap's postings specifically, i'll have to spend
> some time with
> >that, but i know i don't want to be messing with
> mixers.....that
> >kind of screws the whole point of having everything
> in one unit.
>
> Yeah, I'd generally agree that once a mixer comes
> into the picture, I
> find it's easier to toss the dedicated foot pedals.
> Then fall back
> to a portable setup with everything pre-wired into a
> small rack plus
> a controller.
>
> And, as Daryll pointed out, Buzap obviously put a
> lot of time and
> effort into that write-up, and does deserve a great
> deal of thanks
> for going through and documenting the workaround.
>
> --m.
> --
> _______
> "Snakes on a Plane..."
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com