Support |
> here in the US, we're stuck with 60 Hz > hum, annoyingly close to (but not quite in tune with) Bb. Actually, it's 51 cents sharp of Bb, 49 cents flat of B. Close enough that I used to use 60 cycle wall current hum to tune a second piano in a quarter-tone relationship to a normal piano tuned to A=440. > I have a theory > that fluorescent light would look much more natural if a second bulb >could > be used , driven by a somehow-filtered AC/mains circuit to achieve the > tritone of 60 Hz (is that 90 Hz?). The light generated at the tritone >would > have frequency characteristics to compliment the 60 Hz light and take >away > that wicked too-red emphasis that 60 Hz fluorescence has. 90 Hz to 60 Hz is the ratio 3/2, otherwise known as a perfect fifth. 84 Hz would get you much closer to a tritone. Though I don't understand what you are referring to well enough to know if it would alter the "too-red emphasis" or not. In my understanding, fluorescent light is harsh because it's made up of a pulse wave turning the light on and off rapidly. Incadescent light is more akin to analog waveforms like triangle waves. Stephen __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com