[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: OT: PA speakers
I think the SM450 may have a bit more oomph than a PAS, but sonically I did not prefer the Mackie SM450's I've heard vs. my Bose MA-12 (commercial version unpowered) setup. I think the SM's are more middy, but this could be just the EQ'ing on the ones I've heard.
I would say the difference is what do you constitute as 'shlepping'? More trips of lighter products, or less trips with more weight? The Mackie is probably less setup time since it's all one unit. Also the Bose is very dependent on the EQ'ing model selected. Bottom line for me is that's what I use, Bose, because it's what I own (bought for a very, very attractive price of dealer cost - demo % off), and I like the sound and technology. If I had to do it again, I would seriously look at the Mackie line as they appear to be slightly more convienent, not having to drag a sub. But, there is nothing like a good sub to bring out the bass.
RB
---- Original message ----
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:13:41 EDT
From: Nemoguitt@aol.com
Subject: Re: OT: PA speakers
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
In a message dated 5/28/07 12:58:53 PM, rmbaylin@starpower.net writes:
Try looking at the Bose PAS
a wonderful system.....i agree with rainer on that but at the y2k6 we had both the mackie and the bose.....both imho sounded great but for the "schlepp factor" does 1 bose PAS = 1 srm 450.....i seem to remember not being able to carry an entire PAS in one trip.....then if you want to go stereo yikes!.....and of course you will want the subs with the PAS.....both systems are real pill poppers.....age can have it's disadvantages.....:).....mic
www.ct-collective.com
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzepmeci/
http://www.myspace.com/klobuchar11
**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
