Support |
Someone asked how the Audio Technica headset mic compared to the Shure headset mic. I have to say , though I had to diss anything, that the Shure headset microphone is a total waste of money. It has such limited bandwidth. I was extremely dissapointed with it. It didn't come close to comparing with a typical Shure SM58 stage microphone which is a good but not even great stage vocal microphone. I'd buy the Audio Technica any day. But because I've been interested in headset microphones all of my life I want to share something cautionary about their use............ A lot of good live oriented dynamic (non headset) microphones have very prominent proximity effect (the effect that rolls on considerable bass frequencies the closer you get to the mic). Singers like Tony Bennett are famous for knowing how to use proximity effect to very effect usage in terms of controlling the dynamics and timbre of the microphone. Good singers learn how to ''play" the mic like an instrument. You lose all proximity effect or at least the ability to change it when you wear a headset microphone. For my money, you lose so much subtetly in your ability to express yourselves vocally that I don't think I'd ever wear one (watch, mr. hypocrite will probably be gushing about his headset microphone within six months...........lol). Instead, I'd go for a pair of in ear monitors or wireless headphone monitors (the cheapies sold at Radio Shack are actually amazing sounding and eliminate all feedback problems with live microphones). This will give you the ability to wander all over stage and then 'hit the mic' when it is time to do so. You really lose the ability to control things like beatboxing by using a headset mic, where techniques like cradling the mic with your hands makes for super deep bass sounds that are used by all the pro beatboxers. Okee dokee, that's my two cents. rick walker