Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
On 05/07/07, Mech <mech@m3ch.net> wrote: > CPU usage: believe it or not, Live is actually more CPU efficient > than Rax (by about 5-10% on average, in a Powerbook G4 1.67MHz). Live also gives you a lot of control over audio buffer size and plugin processing buffer size, allowing you to effectively trade CPU usage against latency/plugin responsiveness to your taste/needs. > Now, one thing I don't remember testing on Rax was whether it had the > slave-sync idiosyncrasies that plague Live, so that could be a point > in Rax's favor. Rax worked well as a sync slave, in my tests. It's all a bit academic now though, since they killed it. Another host that works well as a sync slave is Numerology. I think this is a host that deserves a lot more attention, especially if you want to get creative with MIDI alongside your audio (e.g. analogue sequencer-style pattern generation driving loop segment playback in Crossfade Loop Synth Effect). Has anyone tried using a good sync slave (e.g. Numerlogy) as a ReWire slave under Live, so the ReWire slave drives Live's tempo? cheers, os. -- os@collective.co.uk http://www.collective.co.uk/ http://www.myspace.com/darkroomtheband