Support |
Don't believe it, the record companies never do anything for the artist in the long run..... I had a 40 page contract that what ever they gave you on page 6 they had a loophole to take back on page 35..... if they did anything in the name of the recording, ( which included lunches, promo, etc. ) those expenses came out of my share of the royalties, The people that played backup on the recording made more money than I did. I did the math once, the record label would pay it's expenses and clear over $150,000.00 before I got the first penny off of that cd..... Now I had a lawyer look it over and he told me that I actually had one of the better contracts he had ever seen because if the recording flopped totally; I at least didn't owe the record label whatever money they had invested. His advice, go and enjoy the ride, and expect that the label will screw you in the end. The recording gave me some valuable experience, and gave me some well needed credibility amongst other industry people. It just makes me laugh when people believe that the record labels care about lost royalties to the artists or composers. all they care about is their own lost revenues and their right to be the only ones to screw us out of the rights and revenues of our music. I suppose I sound a bit bitter, but it makes me really angry that I should have to pay the record label if I want to re-record some of my own compositions and release them independently. ok, I'm better now, the rant is over. I'll go back to be the nice old guy who plays pretty gentle music on the dulcimer.......... Paul Haslem www.dulcify.ca >They basically want them to shut down because nothing of that "1/4 >of the price" would go to the authors, I would not pay anything if >the authors don't get a share, then its better to pirate than paying >to some obscure russian site... > >Stefan > > >-- >Stefan Tiedje------------x------- >--_____-----------|-------------- >--(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()------- >-- _|_)----|-----()-------------- >----------()--------www.ccmix.com >