crap

["RICK WALKER" <looppool@cruzio.com>]

Mark wrote:
"No rules: no standards.  No standards: crap.  If you'd like this list
to become crap, then so be it.  I'll start forwarding every little
thing that interests me to the list."


Mark,  I like you a lot and respect your music but there are times when
you act in such a reactionary way that it reminds me of the
little kid who says,  "If you don't agree with me,
then I'll either take my ball and go home or throw a tantrum."

It's okay to agree to disagree, bro.

It's also ethical to include an OT on a topic that seems to some to be 
tangential to the
looping experience so that you can filter it out if you don't want to read 
it.

Very obviously,  several people who have been active participants in this 
community
for many years find value in those threads, specifically as it relates to 
looping eventually.
The OT: Reading thread has been a popular thread.   Many loopers here have 
participated
and contributed.

I support your right to filter out such content because you don't see it's 
relevance or because you
don't read.

 It would be nice if you in return supported  several people's desire
to be able to read more about the members of this community as a way of 
getting to know
why they make the music they do with looping machines.

It doesn't  have to be crap just because you don't get your way.