Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Makes perfect sense. These pedals are what, 100 bucks? So as long as expectations are realistic, its all good. On Wednesday, December 12, 2007, at 03:24PM, "Ian Popperwell" <popperwell@iname.com> wrote: >Hi, I'm sure you're right about the A2(&2.1U) not doing acoustic guitar >well. However for me, as a flute player, I've found that the A2.1U's EQ, >though not objectively great, has served my purposes well enough. And >when >it also gives me a reasonable chorus + the volume pedal, it gives me what >I'd otherwise need to use 3 pedals for. I don't like the delays and >prefer >the DL4 and now my tc Nova Delay. But, it's good to have a (cheap) multi >FX >pedal that doesn't concentrate on distortion/overdrive & amp simulators. >Incidentally, I'm just about to have the tc/Hellicon VoiceTone Create >delivered, but think I'll still need some EQ to get rid of unwanted lower > & >v high frequencies to give me more isolation from other instruments >onstage, >but I think I'll keep the A2.1U for the EQ and volume pedal muting the fx >I >don't need. > >Any other looping flute players who use quite a lot of effects >(chorus/flanging, pitch shifting, delays, reverb, looping) out there? > >Ian > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Chris Sewell" <lunamusic@mac.com> >To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> >Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 5:01 PM >Subject: Re: Zoom G2 vs Digitech RP150 > > >Just stay away form the Zoom A2. A truly rotten piece of gear. It >makes any good acoustic sound like crap. Zoom doesn't do acoustic >well, but they probably do better at electric sounds I'm guessing. At >least I hope. > >On Dec 12, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Buzap Buzap wrote: > >> Hi Scott >> >> thanks for your detailed comments on the Zoom G2 (+ comparison). >> I usually don't change the delay much, rather, I tap it first and use >it. >> (unless I do some very weird extremely short delays - but then, it >> doesn't matter either). >> >> I also love the "Santana" patch -really great :-) I think it's Mesa >> Boogie amp simulation. >> I think quality-wise - my very subjective opinion - I would rate the >Zoom >> G2 fx like this: >> - modulation effects, wah: great :-) >> - Amp Simulations: really good >> - delay: work very good (but not for a loop artist maybe ;-) >> - pitch shifting: quite useable (but not comparable to real vocal >racks) >> - Reverb/Hall: they sound ok. >> - EQ/compression: not really exciting. >> >> Overall, the Zoom has a professional/sturdy "feel" and good useability >to >> it. >> This is actually a problem I have with the Digitech. Sometimes I'm >> reminded a bit of Behringer, and I don't know what quality level to >> expect. >> But I could be wrong, of course... >> >> Buzap >> >> >> -- >> Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? >> Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger >> > > > > > > >