Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
guys and gals, why donīt we send this wish lists directly to the respective companies? Luis --- Ian Popperwell <popperwell@iname.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I also wish the DL4 had: > > 1. More delay time. > > 2. More looper time (like the Echo Pro. > > 3. A way of going into reverse whilst a loop is > playing without, on the first press going into half > speed. > > 4. A clip to hold the 9V lead in place. > > 5. A loop fade out option. > > 6. a global tap tempo, so that tapping tempo in one > programme means you can change programmes within a > piece without havingt to retap tempo in. > > 7. Mechanically quieter footswitches. > > 8. Tap tempo (probably external footswitch) for the > looper. > > Wishes are great aren't they! > Ian. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Sean Mormelo > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 6:15 PM > Subject: Re: WHAT DON'T YOU LIKE ABOUT YOUR > LOOPER(S) > > > On my DL4 I wish there was more time available and > I wish the switches, both internal and external were > more robust. I replaced all switches connected to > the board and external metal swtiches on the unit. > > > On the RC50 I wish there was a dedicated guitar > and instrument OUT instead of only instrument In. > And the Mic out was an XLR. They way Roland did it > to my mine was not professional. > > > > > On Dec 29, 2007, at 4:32 AM, Jeff Duke wrote: > > > Rick and all, > On the DL-4 I wish that it had more delay time > in the regular models at leasts as much as the > looper, > in lieu of that I wish it had variable feedback > on the looper, I love your 1/4 time switch idea. > More sound mangling > options! > > > On the Boss DD-20 I don't like that it has > 1- no expression pedal control > 2- no feedback on the looper > 3,4- no forward, reverse, half speed, double > speed switchs > 5- except for some tricks talked about on this > list you can't go back and forth between ( i wish > all of the presets) > two or more presets, modifying them as you go. > 6- I wish that you could stop, start the > playback of a loop with the push of a button (no > stutters on this one) > > > That said the two of them together are a blast. > Good topic Rick! > > > Jeff > http://www.thisphase.org/lips.html > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Walker" > <looppool@cruzio.com> > To: "LOOPERS DELIGHT (posting)" > <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 1:53 AM > Subject: WHAT DON'T YOU LIKE ABOUT YOUR > LOOPER(S) > > > > > I"m being approached continually by newbies > and asked > about my recommendations about what to buy > when getting > started with live looping. > > > I have my own personal favorites in different > price ranges (and I'm mostly > talking about hardware here, though do alert > people to how many options are > available through cool new software > solutions). > > > One thing I thought might be valuable as a > resource is to find out > what people DON'T like about their favorite > loopers and what, > in a perfect world, the loop manufacturers > would add to an > existing looping pedal (or software solution). > > > It's nice to know what the drawbacks are in a > pedal when you are trying > figure out if you want to buy it or not. > > > I'll start off by listing one of my favorites > stomp box loopers: > The Line 6 DL-4 Delay Modeller/Looping pedal > (street price $250): > > > > > > > WHAT I DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE LINE 6 DL-4: > > > I love this pedal but wish to hell that it was > a true stereo pedal rather than > a sum to mono pedal that purports to be > stereo. > > > Additionally, I wish it had midi > synchronization. > > > I know that all units that do midi > synchronization cost a lot more, so > it makes me wonder. Does adding midi sync > capability truly > add that much to a floor model live looping > device? > > > And one last wish: I think it would be cool > if it had a 1/4 time switch > as well as a 1/4 time switch for the loops > (which would allow one to > do things that are 4 times as fast or 4 times > as slow depending on > how one started recording (in 1/4 time > bandwidth or full time bandwidth) > > > I know that this would add so many artifacts > that the loop would sound > really weird and non-naturalistic: That's > why I wish it had such a feature > which seems not too difficult to program. > > > Now the Line 6 people have, in the past, been > completley uninterested in > adding features for the sake of the looping > community. The live looping > community is just a small fraction of the > people who buy this > pedal (mostly for it's digital modellings of > all the cool delay units of yesteryear). > > > Still, this is what I"d add. > > > What do you all think about your favorite > pedals limitations? > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 > / === message truncated === www.myspace.com/luisangulocom ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ