Support |
Hey Daryl! Sorry for the late reply, but we were off in Korea on a "visa run". (If there's anybody else from the Loopy list that would know the definition of that term, then I'm sure it's you). I saw you mention the Roland CM-30 Cube Monitors in your original post. I've got a pair of these that I use in a 2.1 setup along with a Gemini 12" powered monitor. I was wondering: how much low end do you need to reproduce for your purposes? The Roland's sound great and have a very good frequency response all the way down through the low mids, but their bass is fairly crippled -- which is why I supplemented mine with a powered sub. They have a pretty hefty rolloff below around 200 Hz, and practically nothing below around 60-80 Hz. But, with a 5" woofer, you can't expect a whole lot of low end response. However, if you're just using them with your acoustic, I think they may be worth taking a look. They're extremely portable; I can easily lift both of mine with just one arm. There are a lot of I/O options, and They're a lot louder than you might think, with low distortion, and, if you can live without the bass response, reproduce tones nicely. Just another $.02 to consider. Regardless, hope things are going well and good luck!!! :) -- Duke. At 1:02 AM -0500 5/14/08, Daryl Shawn wrote: >hey Rick, thanks for sparing the kroner from afar, good to hear your >full and informed review. "Underwhelmed" is a strong phrase...I'm >hearing enough dissenting opinions here and elsewhere that I'm not >convinced I'd be happy with them for this purpose. > >The RCF's are getting great reviews everywhere it seems. I'm seeing >them for $450-550 which is more than I wanted to spend, but more >than that they're not something I can really regularly fly with, >small as they are. I have to weigh a bit more exactly what I want to >do and can spend, but at this point I'm thinking about getting >several passive 10" monitors, leaving one in each of my safe houses >on each coast, and traveling with a small power amp. I have plenty >of choices for passive monitors, but it's been hard finding a power >amp that's NOT rack size. There's this one >(http://www.stewartaudio.com/pa_series.php) but it's a fair amount >of cash for the low wattage. > >(Why can't everywhere that regularly hosts live music invest a few >hundred bucks in a PA appropriate to their needs? /gripe..) > >Much appreciated. Hope you slew the Norse tonight! (so to speak) > >Daryl Shawn >www.swanwelder.com >www.chinapaintingmusic.com > >>Ted Killian asked me to make a special trip to >>check out the Mackie SRM 150 speakers at >>NAMM. >> >>I went and tested them out with a very good singersongwriter and >>some heavy duty beat boxing. >> >>I have to say that I was really underwhelmed.