Why? I suppose live looping is considered a genre by many Matt Stevens www.mattstevensguitar.com
On 3 Jun 2008, at 19:11, Dustin Galish wrote: live sampling would make some people believe you're just using sampled pre recorded sounds live. looping to me suggests all live created sounds
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Matt Stevens < mattstevensguitar@btinternet.com> wrote: mmm Live Sampling - thats good! On 3 Jun 2008, at 18:58, Micha? Wiernowolski wrote: If I understand your question,
'Real Time Sampling' seems wrong to me. Firstly, the term 'Real Time' is redundant, at least in case of sampling
sound. If you are not sure about this think of the opposite 'Non Real Time Sampling', which is an oxymoron.
Now, 'Live sampling' would be a bit better, but it doesn't give the information of what do you do with those samples.
You could possibly play a tune without loops at all.
Cheers,
Michal
Matt Stevens wrote: Does anyone else prefer the term Real Time Sampling to Live Looping(apart from it being the name of a wonderful album by andy butler)?
Just wondered? Someone else suggested Guitar 2.0 to me in an email a few days ago!
Any thoughts?
--
"Fate is a sickness of those who will never strive to be the facilitators of their own creative or spiritual evolutions." |
