Support |
Hi Marco. So when you fade up the 3rd chord you also bring back the 1st chord which is still in the first loop :-( In the worst case, you end up fading between 2 different big tonal washes. I get the sort of effect you're after in the following way, except that I don't have an autoswell, so make the swells with an expression pedal. I have an expression pedal which simultaneously controls the dry volume, the input level to an echo and feedback on the echo. (actually it controls that for 2 LR panned echoes of different length, and also messes with modulation in the feedback loop, but the principle his the same). So I hit a chord and swell it with the expression pedal, ..as long as I hold the pedal down the chord sustains. To change chord, I just bring my toe up, and play another one. By varying the amount of feedback in the toe up position, along with the delay time, I can vary how quick I want the response to be. I do this with a Lexicon Vortex, but the technique should work on other devices. example:- http://www.andybutler.com/mp3/moonset.mp3 andy butler ps. Just noticed that Mark Smart already answered this, but with slighty different explanation. Marco Coblenz wrote: > > > I love the sound of volume swells into high feedback delay / massive > 100% wet reverbs. It's great for those ambient drone sounds. A problem > to me is, if You want to follow a chord progression it easily just turns > into a big tonal wash. > > So I came up with the following idea for a custom pedal: > > - one input, one output, 2 always-on parallel loops (loopA, loop B) > > - loop A and B can be seamlessly blended/mixed via an extern expression > pedal (Roland EV5) into an expression jack (I don't want a rocker style > pedal, prefer external expression control) > > - the blending works in 2 ways at the same time, at the send AND the > return side of each loop but in opposite direction. Example: When Loop A > return is 100%, then is LoopA send 0%, LoopB return 0% and LoopB send >100% > > In each loop will be an verbzilla with 100% wet, max decay cave setting. > The operation would be like this: > 1) play a chord (swelled in via an autovolume pedal) to feed Loop A > (which send is 100% open) > 2) move the exp pedal in the opposite direction. The loop A return is > now 100% open, so that You can hear the first chord now. > 3) While the first chord is still ringing You play the next one which > now feeds loop B but cannot be heard as Loop B's return is closed > 4) move the exp pedal in the opposite direction. You blend in the second > chord while the first one disappears. > 5) go on with 3) and 4) for each new chord > > If You just want the sound be let through as normal You park the exp > pedal in the middle, so both loops get 50% and put out 50% all the time. > > What Do You guys think? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Zeigen Sie es Ihren Freunden! Erstellen Sie kostenlos Fotoalben und > Diashows in Ihrem Space! > ><http://redirect.gimas.net/?cat=hmtl&n=M0804Fotoalbum&d=http://spaces.live.com/api.aspx?wx_action=addModule&mkt=de-DE&wx_ru=http%3a%2f%2f%7bspacesapi%3aid%7d.spaces.live.com%2fphotos%2f&wx_targetSite=PersonalSpaces&wxp_url=%2fphotoalbum.aspx>