Support |
oh, and also I should apologise for going so far off track there andy andy butler wrote: > > > >>> >>> As you'd be the first to acknowledge, there's a number of software >>> developers on this list who don't write crap >>> software, and they might not want to pay to go through some Kafkaesque >>> certification process. >>> >>> andy butler >> >> > > Per Boysen wrote: >> Since you answering to the list on things I'm not talking about in my >> posts, I'd like to try another post here to explain my point better: >> >> In particular I'm talking about the "Audio Unit Validator", a simple >> utility that has already been around for some four or five years. >> Together with a specification for the plug-in format this makes it >> easy for small developers to (A) check out how to program an AU that >> will be compatible with hosts etc and (B) bug check their work. > > > ok, that sounds cool :-) > > "Apple is putting some serious effort into a validation system to keep > badly coded AU plug-ins out of the market." > > translate > > "Apple is putting some serious effort to help developers make plugins > that conform to the AU standard." > > > which doesn't have any of the sinister resonance for me > > andy > > > >