Support |
Hi Per, Let me explain better,as soon as i hit the second record to close the loop the loop playback starts really fast, almost like skipping the first beat...make sense? Hmmm i dont understand what you are saying about my mail client because i see it on the list and everybody seems to be getting them.I did see yesterday that when you mailed me it was off list so when i replied it was sent to you only so you might want to check your mail client. Let me know cheers Luis www.myspace.com/luisangulocom --- On Thu, 9/4/08, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: ( Mobius rhythmic accuracy) was: now That First Loop > To: "loopers-delight" <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008, 1:47 AM > Hi, > > I guess there must be some part of information missing here > because > what you are describing is simply not possible! As I > understand it you > are doing three things: > > 1. Kick Record. > 2. Play your instrument (which is now being recoded by the > looper). > 3. Kick Record. > > Now, you're saying that after this process the loop > starts playing > back "faster or ahead of time". But no looper in > the world can read > your thoughts an know in advance when you will kick Record > the second > time to close the loop, set the loop point and start > playback of the > recorded loop! ;-)) > > Please fill us in with the missing pieces so we can sort > this out! > > (BTW, you still have your email client set to your own > address in the > "Reply to" field. This is why your list posts are > sent back to you > privately instead of to the list) > > Per > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:15 AM, L.A. Angulo > <labaloops@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Now that i finally got the driver issue with mobius > out if the way i am having a similar problem; with the MME > drivers mobius had latency when i triggered it with the > fcb1010,now that is working with ASIO(which by the way it > was a matter of assigning correcly the ports of my RME > fireface)it responds nice and fast but when i record a loop > and end it,playback starts faster or ahead of time which can > throw me off,same when i do overdubing! > > anybody having this problem?compared to the EDP is > there an difference in accuracy response? would i just have > to adapt to this and live with it,or is it a setup problem? > > Luis > > > > > > > > www.myspace.com/luisangulocom > > > > > > --- On Thu, 9/4/08, andy butler > <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> From: andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> > >> Subject: Re: New Member - was Buying Advice, now > That First Loop > >> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > >> Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008, 12:53 AM > >> Or alternatively:- > >> > >> The most accurate and reliable method to create > that first > >> loop is > >> to tap at the beginning of the loop, and then tap > at the > >> end. > >> By using the same method to start the loop as to > end it, > >> there's > >> a slight (but significant) advantage in that any > timing > >> discrepancies > >> between the tapping and the playing will cancel > out. > >> (e.g. if you tap slighty early both times, you > still get an > >> accurate loop length). > >> Any method that uses 2 different actions to start > and end > >> the loop is likely > >> to mess with accurate timing. > >> > >> While it's often recommended to play a rhythm > part > >> through a couple of times > >> before recording it this does not give any > advantage, you > >> still have to > >> learn to co-ordinate yourself ,you don't learn > any of > >> the looping > >> skills you'd need for more complex > arrangements and it > >> doesn't > >> sound/look as cool. > >> > >> The tap-play-tap method may seem a bit hard at > first, but > >> it's actually not > >> at all hard to learn, I've seen people > "get > >> it" in about 5 mins of trying. > >> (just practise a short rhythm loop till it works). > >> > >> Respect to Dave for describing a couple of other > >> techniques. > >> > >> I'd also say that it's better to turn off > the > >> pre-set tempo on the looper, > >> and just tap in the loop. > >> (unless you need to sync up for some reason} > >> > >> andy butler > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Dave Gallaher wrote: > >> > I assume the Boss Loop Station you have is > like mine, > >> and therefore has the > >> > Autostart setting available. This will > reduce 50% of > >> your loop error > >> > potential right off the bat if you are > starting from > >> silence. Select > >> > Autostart; set the level to the point where a > >> well-played note (but not an > >> > accidental click or handling noise) will > begin the > >> loop. Then all you have > >> > to do is end on time, and it's much > easier to hit > >> the '1' following several > >> > measures of playing than it is to start dead > on. > >> > > >> > Another technique: if you are going to lay a > rhythm > >> guitar pattern down as > >> > the bed, play it a couple times before > hitting the > >> loop. If you have any > >> > discrepancy in your tempo between your > starting point > >> and the end of the > >> > phrase, you can usually be rid of it after a > go-round > >> or two. Using > >> > autostart, simply play the guitar pattern, > stop for a > >> four beat rest while > >> > stepping on the record pedal, then begin on > >> '1'. > >> > > >> > I have no experience recording with included > clicks > >> and drum rhythms, so > >> > this advice may be useless to you if this is > your > >> mode. > >> > > >> > dave > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: New Member - Buying Advice and > Opinions > >> Sought > >> > > >> > Thank you all for your advice. I really > appreciated > >> it. > >> > > >> > I had it down to the following three -- > >> > > >> > A) Boomerang with 2-channel Mixer -- not > feasible, as > >> the footprint and > >> > extra setup for a mixer would detract from > what I need > >> it to do in the way I > >> > need it to work (get up on stage, set up, go > quickly) > >> > > >> > B) Digitech JamMan - looked great, but > realistically > >> when live could only > >> > record one phrase at a time (otherwise would > have to > >> stop and save) > >> > > >> > C) Boss Loop Station - expensive and > finicky, with a > >> large number of > >> > complaints registered online, and even a > known > >> "glitch" that bothers some > >> > people regarding a playback gap. > >> > > >> > In the end, I went with the Boss Loop > Station, due > >> mostly to the links > >> > provided by members here, and their comments. > In the > >> scant hour I've spent > >> > messing with it, I've already been able > to do two > >> tunes that I couldn't do > >> > solo (tough to do a 3-part harmony/bodhran > song by > >> yourself -- without a > >> > looping station, that is). > >> > > >> > Now to practice! > >> > > >> > (yegods, laying down that first track so it > repeats > >> nicely, in a timely > >> > regular fashion, is an ART! ... It took me > awhile to > >> figure out that the > >> > tempo light switched red on the FIRST beat > ... My > >> brain keeps insisting that > >> > red must be on the FOURTH beat for some > reason?!) > >> > > >> > If anybody wishes to pass me the > links/references on > >> "looping for newbies -- > >> > how to lay an initial decent rhythm track in > under 20 > >> minutes!" then feel > >> > free to e-mail me privately (so as not to > spam the > >> list with my newbie > >> > stuff). > >> > > >> > Thank you all again for the advice. I > appreciate it. > >> > > >> > > >> >